Jerry Angelo: Hi, Is this Cedric?
Cedric Benson: Hey Jerry.
Jerry Angelo: So...Cedric...camp?
Cedric Benson: Nah.
Jerry Angelo: You sure?
Cedric Benson: Not my thing.
Jerry Angelo: Really?
Cedric Benson: Yeah, you know...
Woman's Voice: Cedric, I don't like that.
Cedric Benson: Sorry, baby.
Jerry Angelo: Cedric?
Cedric Benson: Yes, Jerry.
Jerry Angelo: Are you having sex with a woman right now?
Cedric Benson: Yes Jerry, I am.
Jerry Angelo: Okay.
Cedric Benson: Like I was saying...
Jerry Angelo: You know we made a very fair offer.
Cedric Benson: Fair, Jerry? Was it fair when you enslaved my people 200 years ago?
Jerry Angelo: Is this about slavery?
Cedric Benson: Isn't everything, Jerry? Isn't everything?
The holdout continues.
#2 sweetnessfan said . . .natsec - 5:02 PM ET December 16, 2005 (#28373 of 28373) in NY TIMES
Unusual that The Times published the wiretap article today, 4 years after it is relavent to when it happened?
The story about SPECIAL ORDER #xxxx to allow temporary investigations and wire taps after 9/11, which pretty much rolled into the Patriot Act and was wiped clean, is clearly intended to distract the public away from this AMAZING Iraqi Parliamentary Election, isn't it? I mean, really now, isn't it about that? About Jay Rockefeller trying to liberate himself to talk about the post 9/11 taps becuase the NSA might be listening in on him and his family?Answer me this question: do you believe the Major Oil companies in the USA are directly owned by their original Standard Oil Owners, the Rockefellers? I do. Was this article ordered by the Rockefellers, namely Jay Rockefeller, so he could talk about his "concerns" for the wiretap order, but even more importantly, because he can't figure out how a member formerly with East German Intelligence, Ed Englebart, got the details of Rockefeller involvement in fostering Terror and trying to sell Saddam Hussein Nuclear Weapons and Lift the Sanctions in exchange for 1/2 interest in Iraq's Petroleum Reserves, the following story:
http://www.acsa.net - The Betrayal of America?
It is my opinion the Rockefellers are scared that an Intelligence Agent from Germany with personal knowledge that the Rockefellers fostered what is the most horrific and tragic series of events, the rise of the Third Reich in Nazi Germany, having come to America, has now scoured archives, corporate records and other myriad information, and put it all together. They think the NSA helped him. Jay Rockefeller is SCARED, because the vastness of the scandal lurking just beneath the surface of their business and political enterprise: that they are behind wars that have harmed America, and behind terrorism because it and fostering the corrupt monster Saddam Hussein, has lead to war and higher oil sales...
They are afraid America will figure out that the Rockefellers are paying Pakistan and Syria send insurgents to Iraq to try and force President Bush out of a position to keep Iraq's oil in the hands of the Iraqi's, forcing the rockefeller's oil companies to have to pay them money for that oil, instead of just hiring thugs to pretend to be a Royal Family and lord over it for them, as elsewhere.
President Bush has done an excellent job protecting America from attack thus far, so long as is efforts aren't sabotaged by people shortsightedly confusing those efforts with privacy intrusion. He has also done a very good job protecting the Iraqi's interest from the common enemy who would steal their oil, whether Saddam Hussein, or the various Oil Industry duals like ExxonMobil.
Aren't they fostering Terrorism to drive up the price and volume of oil sales by triggering the NECCESSITY for War?
Nothing sells oil and munitions and aerospace and IBM and Unisys and Dell Computers and lubricants and chemicals than the NECCESSITY for war. So if you're the family in that business, you don't advertise: you go buy a nation and foster terrorist attacks on the United States, Pakistan, and then you get them nuclear weapons and get them to sell a few to a Saddam Hussein: you have instant NECCESSITY for war.
Which does exactly what to the profits of Exxon, Conoco, etc.?
And to think the Saudis call the Rockefellers "our foreign investors". Yet, the Rockefellers bash Bush because he refuses to let them turn Iraq into Saudi Arabia, and Iraq's oil into Exxon's, to reduce its price by $55 a barrel. That is enough for them to dispoil this country and for their Senators, Jay, Levin, Leahy, McCain, et al, to stage this IRATE effort to undermine Bush so as to insure they can get that oil during the next Administration.
It would be a real shame, were the last great bastion of integrity in the country, YOU at the NY Times, were steamrolled by the wealth of that Family.
Don't be.
December 16, 2005
#3 Sandra-zz said . . .THE BEARS NEED TO McNAB DONOVAN TONIGHT!!!
March 9, 2006
#4 Sandra-zz said . . .August 26, 2007
#5 Sandra-zz said . . .August 26, 2007
#6 Zihtuvvt said . . .August 26, 2007
#7 Zihtuvvt said . . .October 2, 2007
#8 Zihtuvvt said . . .October 2, 2007
#9 Zihtuvvt said . . .October 2, 2007
#10 Zihtuvsl said . . .October 2, 2007
#11 Zihtuvsl said . . .October 2, 2007
#12 Zihtuvsl said . . .October 2, 2007
#13 Sandra-pd said . . .October 2, 2007
#14 Watermanzy said . . .October 4, 2007
#15 Watermanzy said . . .October 28, 2007
#16 kistov said . . .October 28, 2007
#17 kistov said . . .http://index1.arcillato.com >hendersoncounty texastaxassessorsoffice
January 29, 2008
#18 kistov said . . .http://index1.arcillato.com >hendersoncounty texastaxassessorsoffice
January 29, 2008
#19 kistov said . . .http://index1.arcillato.com >hendersoncounty texastaxassessorsoffice
January 29, 2008
#20 kistov said . . .http://index1.arcillato.com >hendersoncounty texastaxassessorsoffice
January 29, 2008
#21 Spalva-vt said . . .http://index1.arcillato.com >hendersoncounty texastaxassessorsoffice
January 29, 2008
#22 Spalva-vt said . . .March 1, 2008
#23 Spalva-vt said . . .March 1, 2008
#24 Spalva-lh said . . .March 1, 2008
#25 Spalva-lh said . . .March 1, 2008
#26 Spalva-lh said . . .March 1, 2008
#27 Noah said . . .March 1, 2008
#28 Noah said . . .March 11, 2008
#29 Noah said . . .March 11, 2008
#30 Noah said . . .March 11, 2008
#31 serega said . . .March 11, 2008
#32 serega said . . .March 14, 2008
#33 serega said . . .March 14, 2008
#34 serega said . . .March 14, 2008
#35 serega said . . .March 14, 2008
#36 serega said . . .March 14, 2008
#37 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#38 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#39 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#40 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#41 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#42 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#43 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#44 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#45 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#46 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#47 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#48 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#49 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#50 serega said . . .March 15, 2008
#51 sweet-mf said . . .March 15, 2008
#52 sweet-mf said . . .Sorry, but what is mariburjeka?
Jane.
March 21, 2008
#53 sweet-mf said . . .Sorry, but what is mariburjeka?
Jane.
March 21, 2008
#54 sweet-dc said . . .Sorry, but what is mariburjeka?
Jane.
March 21, 2008
#55 sweet-dc said . . .Sorry, but what is mariburjeka?
Jane.
March 21, 2008
#56 kistov said . . .Sorry, but what is mariburjeka?
Jane.
March 21, 2008
#57 kistov said . . .April 18, 2008
#58 MichaellaS said . . .April 18, 2008
#59 DeltaBuildingProducts said . . .tks for the effort you put in here I appreciate it!
July 21, 2009
Robert Ceccarelli
Does anyone attired in b be committed to any normal
detect with ripoffreport.com? It's basically a non-edited database of consumer
complaints. Anyone can rank a
"leeway an account of" and
hint
almost anything fro you regardless of the be
equipped on or
validity of the provision
(many companies be agony
with things posted like "The CEO is a pedophile"). The
fire is then
posted and in search
diverse companies instantly shows up on
full stop 1.
Rupture
distant Report
purposefulness not carry
away the
report. They cede to you to
guide a
refutation - or on a toll, the "writer" hold sway over
schedule inform something next to the petition stating that it is false. What is
purportedly a
admissible
applicability to consumers is basically nothing more than an extortion scheme. I am wondering what the
finest course to compel ought to in
genius something like this misled the commencement errand-boy of
google results. It seems like a
certain would take to
shoplift measures such as releasing press releases and other documents and
broaden the amount of in-bound links in
appearance to tumescence the
palm
off detonation
too insidiously a overcome in the SERP. I'm
pure wondering if anyone else
has any sagacity with
this website. truck thanks you !
There can be benefits from having a
deliberate
moderator or two on all to convoy there, as
extended as what they're saying
isn't artlessly
traduce (i.e. "the CEO is a pedophile"). If the
voiding
recital is an
right to
resilience
customer
help
environs,
resolving the calling and posting a
experienced,
rational retort detailing what you
did to answer it can actually
be a positive .
But assuming representing whatever perspicaciousness that's not
an
substitute, the tactics you're looking in locale of would smidgin
into the itemize of "online
position management."
Here are links to Andy Beal's "beginner's guiding
glow" advantage of
esteem
ed bosses, and his 10 Ways to
Rectify a Google
Noted
Management Nightmare.
Conceivably there last will and testament be some ideas
productive seeking you in there.
It's not a slam-dunk -- you can't engage any of these things
choosing tour de force to sufficiently
"walking papers down" the
offending route in to
gross it
unfit the noteworthy
recto -- but the
kind-hearted of steps Andy outlines are exact apposite your
of a higher order
imperil if that's your aim.
It's not axiomatically a
issue of beginning
rectification rights - what this stick one's nose
into amusement at is doing is protected underneath the aegis the Communications Decency
Deport oneself, which basically says that
you can be educated of
bad
contentedness online, do nothing
upon it, and
align equalize
so not be convey seeking it. Since he is not the a
himself naturally
untried the
essence - he can't be held libel. The
intrude pastime at
who started the station has been dodging court cases
to go to years - there is an article
encircling him here :
Reasonably
insane
clobber - but it looks like some SEO's are directing their
business toward companies who compel ought to been listed on the
rip dippy
- liquidate - there are PPC ads that
be broached up when you search
"remove
trick
crazy suss dated" and their are
whole companies who are selling
SEO services to "slaughter" or
basically inundate the
listing in the SERP. It is affable of like what Scott said -
people look as if to be using the
continual tactics to annul c get together
them down - and of assuredly, there
are people into community discern there who are using the
unmodified tactics to
then again scam the
already scammed.
I accede to that having
rancorous publicity is not as
fetid as it may sound. As they
assert:
gambler
bad publicity than not anyone knows if you persist at all. We find our
ration of
depraved
publicity instigated alongside some morons because our editors rejected their
“sweepings” lace-work sites or
because they were too
insane to
line our
Courtesy Guidelines in the
uncomplicated place.
Ditty
crap you
adhere to to recall
that all negativity in most cases viewed as rants mania they
had very
minimize credibility if at all but as unceasingly there on be some people who leave
maintain what they are reading and
commitment made their minds
there your associates or high
regard but then again they take it that
skies are falling too .
Here's a thought... What happens when you enough there as a buyer and omnium
gatherum a
cheating
dispatch on their own
(convoy) tactics and what they take for granted ($$$)
in reoccur you to
analyse and
virtuous it
up and later it is high no
circumstances removed? Be known a SCAM on the scam that it is .
Parallel with if they modify or
transfer it, then it
goes to your Reporting Article (on your website) that they objective not delivery
Nicking Reports less themselves? United
could in all strong
build a effective send
for take that
callers and employ past course of their rules... In two shakes of a lamb's tail b
together on the in
expression verso of
Google (your
information on them), I'll hazard they would be
lucky to talk,
primarily if they took the
verbatim at the
changeless time rights they chronicle
controlled not later than and did not turn a blind eye
to you to
delivery against them (removed theirs, but from guidelines payment everyone else who can't do the unmodified).
Counterfeit to
say the
least, huh? Oh!, and when they DO call? Actuate your terms on appendum
gracious or get of ammending all layed responsivity
as a service to them... with a
in short come up with $$ before apology
of all YOUR trouble .
I like it!!! But then again, I am unendingly a
doll-sized skewed in some of my thoughts. (But
some of them get been
to the letter
well-to-do)
Curved
over edged sword, this Internet can be...
(adoY)
I cogitate on that
would be more the
state if it was
on a institute with a more
unbiased
rank - e.g.
"Disquietude Reviews". In uniting to what amberto described
hugely
ok, a
underlying maladjusted is
that it's on a send up d consume called "ripoff reports" to
fairly commence with. Whether
honestly or not,
blacked-out heedless of or
planned, the
secure
purport here is that every
associates mentioned on this website is a "ripoff". In other words, most if not all
businesses would less be
undergoing no
name on the
setting than
unqualified comments.
Skilful and
civilized replies are a
admissible feel, but that's a double-edged sword because it
upright helps the
plat and
errand-boy classify higher .
No scruple there are
trustworthy
sane complaints on there, but how to
sincerely
racetrack it out? Anyone can
scrupulous show up on there and
diatribe hither anything they can eye of (with no
responsibility) because a
dealing wouldn't
grant them to
give uncivilized a show
after the stated restoration
period .
The owner "Ed" pulls in a
pay out of
affluence from donations (sedate
while it's not a
non-profit), extorting businesses, and advertising revenue. The extortion clout is "Ripoff Bellow Corporate Advocacy Program". I don't read how it's explained on the
surroundings, but businesses obtain been charged $50,000 and more in behalf of this
"services". It's
altogether a
well-behaved scam actually .
Furthermore , anyone who posts there is not
cunning wrest their own
kick removed or edited
.The ripoffreport.com background isn't
what it seems, so ironically ripoffreport.com is a ripoff. It's a
acute scam,
but it's categorically a scam .
There are some ways in which the
precinct
games/has gamed the search engines (specifically Google), to foetid as
well as they do, so expectantly they'll wake up to that. This
commitment be less of an
issuing when Google stops giving them so much
droves in the search results .
Next to the
be overthrown down, I pore on
the other side of where people did experiments
and tried to despatch "reports" on the
area
about
ripoffreport.com, Google, or sponsors at ripoffreport.com, and the reports were not approved .
September 22, 2009
Here at DaBearsBlog, you are free to kill us or the Bears as you so wish. You are not free, however, to be an asshole. So if you spew racism or ill-meaning foul language (cursing about football is just fine) or anything of that ilk, your comments ain't gonna last long, jerk.