Jeff is on his way down to Atlantic City, so I'm just gonna give you all space to do your thing.
That was a big one.
#2 Sayers said . . .Great game! All week long, I've been reading the comments here but let me be the first to say it, the Seahawks brought their A game today and if they had one, it would have meant they earned it. Good job Seattle. Not quite good enough though!
Time to welcome the Saints fans.
January 14, 2007
#3 Ted said . . .that's "won", not "one"....
January 14, 2007
#4 Bear Down said . . .Fantastic game... exciting in every aspect, and remarkably free of many mistakes. Gotta love Rashied Davis, that old Arena League guy, for saving our bacon and getting us into Robbie's range.
Bring on the Saints !
I am waiting for PackIsBack to come on here and issue an abject apology for his scurrilous remarks and nonsensical predictions. He must be inconveniently delayed... or something.
January 14, 2007
#5 FlowControl said . . .This justifies all the hours I have spent in front of the TV rooting this team on. Congrats boys, we all knew you had it in you!! Enjoy tonight (Everyone except Tank!! Tank stay home tonight) and lets get back to work to win the NFC!!! 1 more win
January 14, 2007
#6 Mikey said . . .I see you guys started a new comments so i want to make sure to place congrats to the winning team!
Good Game!
Damn what a finish, who seen this going into overtime?
Wow..congtradulations Chicago!! I told you youd have to earn it and you did!
Go Hawks See yah at home, twasnt a bad aseason at all. I have to say this came down to a field goal! I didnt think it would.
Good luck with the Saints Chicago!Again..
GO NFC!!!
See yah next year.
Again thanks for the Blog, thanks for the good game!
January 14, 2007
#7 Green Lantern said . . .Ok, I'll give credit where credit is due. Kudos to the Bears. BUT, if this is the best you can do at home against a team riddled with injuries on both sides of the ball, New Orleans is going to embarrass you on national TV in your own stadium.
If anything, you need to send a big fat thank you note to our offensive coordinator and Mike Holmgren. It was their pathetic play calling in the last series that gave you the game, because let's be realistic... you have a somewhat above average team led by an average quarterback.
My prediction - Saints 34, Bears 17
Enjoy the victory, but you and I both know that the Seahawks would have won this game by 10 or more with their starting secondary in place.
January 14, 2007
#8 Hester 4 President said . . .VERY HAPPY, more a sigh of relief than anything though.
some thoughts:
1) this bears team has not had many drops this year and then two huge ones.....if moose and berrian catch those two the beloved win this game by 10. those won't happen again
2) why so much passing??? this game against this small D that rarely stopped them should have featured a combined 40 carries at least, instead only 33 and several of those were at the very end just setting up gould's field goal. next week needs to feature lots more running, they're really good at it and the O-Line had some pass blocking problems today
3) the bears didn't play all that well today and still beat the defending NFC champs. i like the chances next week. forecast is for 34 and sunny FYI but that can change quickly.
4) A PLAYOFF WIN! celebrate gentlemen.
3)
January 14, 2007
#9 Dave said . . .We should thank your offensive corrdinator?
Did you see the play calls we had from our OC?
GOOD AS GOULD!!
GO BEARS!
January 14, 2007
#10 The Pack is Back said . . .Man you guy's will never get any respect. Why? Because you haven't earned it yet.
Like Terry Bradshaw said on the Fox pregame. You're here in the playoffs because you play the weakest schedule, in the weakest conference.
Mikey is right. If you couldn't stop a wounded team like Seattle with a defense just signed off the street corner, what the fuck are you gonna do against a team like N.O. You're gonna get steam rolled
I think 41-10 Saints. Sorry man, enjoy it while it lasts.
January 14, 2007
#11 Ted said . . .If anyone needs a loan, let me know. I ran into a pile of cash today.
January 14, 2007
#12 mikebdot said . . .Ahhh, I see that is how PIB says "Owww, owww, owww.. it hurts, it hurts, it hurts". He claims to have bet on the Hawks.
I thought surely he could act like a man, and have some class, like Bart and Bret. Instead, we get this pathetic excuse for an apology.
January 14, 2007
#13 Dave said . . .Didn't someone say they liked Chris Harris in favor of Johnson to stop the run? What an awful performance at his position today. Why did they not play Johnson after the first half? Harris did not make one good tackle. What I wouldn't give to see Mike Brown play another football game this year...
January 14, 2007
#14 Bub said . . .Hey, how come pissed off hasn't posted yet. I like this guy.
He reminds me of the little punk kid in your neighborhood who'd call you a fucker from a half block away and then run into the house.
Just read his shit. Man he fuckin talks more shit then anybody and fucking crys like a little bitch when someone else throws it back.
Hey, maybe he and megan are one in the same.
Oh well, I figured he'd be on here right away just slinging his shit.
January 14, 2007
#15 Megan said . . .Congrats Bearies. You got yourself a win and I know the feeling - it feels good. So enjoy it. Thanks to those who have been respectful of my Seahawks team. It was a good fight, a good game. Good luck in the rest of the playoffs.
January 15, 2007
#16 Megan said . . .I think that the offense threw a lot to take advantage of the battered up secondary and the "street-signed" corners...
I don't think I heard about those guys enough.
I wish we could have seen the run more. I really appreciated that long ball throw to Moose.. that was killer.. I did want to see the clock burned more with the run. We were able to get 3-5 yards a carry, that can get us first downs.
But HECK! we WON! What a game! I had to use the portable defibrillator on myself several times; amazingly, Guinness worked even better.
I am so psyched for the Saints! It should be a good game.January 15, 2007
#17 Midway Monster said . . .Thanks FC for your congrats! It has been a pleasure reading your sportsman-like and insightful posts!
January 15, 2007
#18 The Pack is Back said . . .Imz to drunks to comnet! Celebratink....
--Midzway--
January 15, 2007
#19 Megan said . . ."He claims to have bet on the Hawks. "
Of course I bet on the Hawks. I'm no moron.
January 15, 2007
#20 Mike said . . .If we aren't careful, Dave or PIB might put Midway's hand in warm water, or shaving cream in his hand. I'll hide Dave's nail polish and PIB's official Brett Farve's weep-like-a-sissy make-up kit.
January 15, 2007
#21 max said . . .as for how we would have done against the Seahawks' starting secondary -- you think having Tommie Harris and Mike Brown would have done anything for us?
also, stat I've never seen before: the Seahawks were 0 for 7 (or 8, not sure) on third and three or less. That is damn impressive.
January 15, 2007
#22 LG said . . .RASHIED DAVIS. Give the man some love. Rex did well, our D was questionable at times. TJ and Cedric rocked out. And Hester still scares the hell outa me every time he touches the ball. Would have been a complete game if AP had made a third down conversion.
And come on now. . . Saints 41-10???? No chance. Dome team in Chicago in January? Advantage Bears. Besides. Saints D aint great either.
Regardless im goin to be in bliss mode for the next several days
January 15, 2007
#23 Mikey said . . .Hey bears fans, and I am one:
Am I the only one who feels like I'm in a dysfucntional family with Dad not acknowledging he has a drinking problem?
Grossman is still suspect and today by no means erased any doubts what so ever. If anything, RG's performance reinforced the fact. ALL game the called plays were designed so he didn't have to make any deicsions, especially poor ones. I had to laugh at the hyprcosy! All during the even Aikman observed how the bears were playing around grossman's hadicap....then what happens? after the game the media rides the wagon: Rex this, Rex that...exercised his deamons_ BullS*&t!
A good QB would have picked the Seattle safety's apart....New Orleans is way better than the bears at the moment. I realize this is herasey fro a bears fan, but please, lets be honest here....Grossman is not a franchise QB, never has been, never will be.
Even if Da'Bears manage to with the SB, I still stand by my position
January 15, 2007
#24 T.C. said . . .Let me make this clear (which I failed to do in my first post) had the Hawks pulled this one out, I didn't think they stood a chance against the Saints either.
The funny thing is, any analyst would say given all of our injuries, the Hawks had a very successful season. For the Bears it's completely different. If they don't win the NFC championship the season will be looked at as a failure.
The sad thing is for both teams is that the window of opportunity for a team to win the superbowl is very small... and there is so much parity in the NFL that's it's really tough to make it to the playoffs (let alone a league championship game) two years in a row (the Steelers are a great example of that).
January 15, 2007
#25 Dave said . . .shit...i dont comment on the site, i am more of a frequent reader. Todays game only concreted what i stated already. Our defense is shaky...it scares me to death with all the weapons the saints have. I really hope that max is right and the saints are a warm weather team. On another note, patriots beating the chargers is huge. If we get to the super bowl...i would rather face the likes of the colts and the patriots than the chargers.
January 15, 2007
#26 Megan said . . .And I'll bring megan the 2x large mouse matress's for a little more protection, if you know what I mean baby?
Who ever said Mile brown would have made diffence is crazy. That pussy can't make it through a whole season so you'll never know. Give up and that chump.
As far as Harris goes. He started tailing off with the rest of the defense when he went down. But I don't think he would've had that much of an impact.
And how bout my Pats man. They didn't even play that well and won.
LT that little bitch ran off the field when the game was over because he didn't like it when the Pats celabrated after the missed kick. Little loser bitch.
Saint 41, Bears 10.
January 15, 2007
#27 mikebdot said . . .The stars need to align...
Mikey, you are right the window is small. Barring injuries, off-the-field mis-steps/antics, teams may look golden and not win or have golden players that screw up. I think the Colts of last season can also speak to that.
I don't know what analysts you are referring to, but we are in the play-offs, up for the NFC championship. I think that we have had a successful season. We have had injury after injury, we have had good games and questionable performances out of our good players. That is what any sport is all about. Tiger Woods looses, and Wayne Gretzky makes bad decisions off the ice. Nobody is perfect.
What is sweet is seeing your team give it their all, connect with the fans, feel the pulse of the stadium and having the fans give just a little more volume. If today's game was in Seattle, Bears fans may not be high-fiving each other right now.
Hearing about the offense and defense support and encourage each other... Did you see the sidelines, after Rex threw to Moose in the first half? Both sides of the ball were congratulating Rex/Moose.
That is what makes a team, and a successful one. I can feel the passion in their hearts probably more so this season then any season for a long time. Fans bitch, play arm-chair quarterback and question play calling. That is what fans do.
Things just have to fall into place at just the right moment and for just the right person. Attitude can also make or break you.January 15, 2007
#28 scott said . . .Also, note to those dissing Grossman. INT may have been a TD pass had Moose actually caught the damn ball (probably would have been stopped). Also, a sure TD was dropped by Berrian as well. True the ball wasn't perfectly thrown, however it should have been caught (he had plenty of time to react to the ball, just didn't turn correctly). If those two passes went for TDs (and not a pick), his rating would have been to 114 (which shows you how worthless that statistic really is). Even if Moose would have just caught the ball and was stopped at the 1 yard line it would be a 105. Pretty crazy huh? If you don't believe me, feel free to email me and I can send you the excel file.
I do agree we passed a few too many times. Especially on a couple 2nd and 3rd downs (consecutively) after getting 2 or 3 on the ground on 1st down.
Why didn't we call a timeout with 0:19 left in the game with Hester our return man? Because he could have fumbled it (which would be a legit argument watching most of the times he touched the ball today)? Regardless, I thought that would have been a no brainer...especially with 2 timeouts left, we could have returned it to the 40 or so (or for a TD) with 7 or 8 seconds left and thrown a 20 yard out route to stop the clock...yes, risky, but exciting as well. It was a risky proposition for the Seahawks getting the ball in OT too!
January 15, 2007
#29 Bear Down said . . .Phew. What a game. I, for one, am not paying attention to QB ratings at this time of year. My guess is that Manning and Brady feel the same. Bad numbers but a W for each. Rex played a good game. Made the key throws when he had to and we won. Simple as that. I'll take a ditto performance next week as long as we win. As for the know-nothing blowhards who root against the Bears and lurk on this site, you predicted a Bears loss this week so I expect nothing less for next. Bring it on.
January 15, 2007
#30 The Pack is Back said . . .At least we didn't hear this one again..."We want the ball and we're gonna score!"
January 15, 2007
#31 Jerry said . . .Just as I figured. The bears opened at -3 and you needed to get in early if you wanted to get maximum points. So many takers that the bears are down to -1. Nobody in their right mind will bet the bears after that outing. The girl scouts could move through that defense. rex is lucky that pass wasn't picked off on that first drive. 50% chance it gets picked. It would have made the difference.
January 15, 2007
#32 District Selectman said . . .Dave, you have some serious issues. What the hell are fucking with Megan about?
Sorry Megs, I know you can handle yourself but damn, what the fuck?
PO stated a few days ago he would return Monday, hang around like the freakin vulture you are Dave, PO will adequately address your concerns.
You know what though; we kicked ass! Yes I said it, we kicked ass.
I think Brigss did a hell of a job today, not a lot of press what what a presence.
Bear down, always.
January 15, 2007
#33 Ted said . . .Sayers, I beg to differ. Both teams played very well. Seattle had 4 penalties for a whopping 16 yards and only turned it over once. It's obvious that the Seahawks are a different team with Shaun Alexander (as are we with Mike Brown and Tommie Harris). Nice game, Seattle. I enjoyed the banter.
Rex was very good today, very clutch. Shied and Berrian were f'ing large. I'm worried about Bradley, though -- any news?
If Briggs plays next week like he did today, I'll be a lot less worried about Deuce and Bush.
Lastly, to PiB, I know many, many Packer fans, and thank goodness none is a cockswab like you. As for Dave, well...I don't know any other Patriot fans.
January 15, 2007
#34 Nick said . . .Mmmmmmmm... I love the smell of napalm in the morning... and Peckers burning... makes me think of... Victory.
I wonder why old PIB can't bring himself to do the honorable thing and admit that he was wrong... as always.
You can always tell the Losers... by how they talk about the point spread. Congratulations, PIB. How much of a spread did the Packers have on their playoff wins this year?
January 15, 2007
#35 Polish Sausage said . . .Dave, your a moron. PiB , go eat some cheese.
WOOOOOOOOOOO!!
Good game SeaHawks, i really didn't like the way it ended but hell, a win is a win.
I jumped so high after that ball left Goulds foot I hit my head on the ceiling!!Thanks to the CLASSY SEAHAWK fans for the banter, good stuff.
January 15, 2007
#36 District Selectman said . . .Reading these posts, reading commentary from the major web sites, it seems like I was watching a different game from everyone else. While both teams were far from perfect, I was impressed by Seattle's toughness and with the Bears' defensive execution down the stretch. It was an exciting game in which the whole city can rejoice. Can you ask for a more gratifying finish?
The problem is, the whole city has become bogged down by expectations, taking anything less than perfection as a sign of inevitable doom. Peyton Manning and Tom Brady each threw 3 interceptions in their wins this weekened, but you certainly don't see analysts calling for their heads. But when Rex Grossman ALMOST throws an interception on the first drive of the game, it means that we've got no chance against New Orleans.
Grossman put his team in a position to win the game, just like Brees, Manning, and Brady did with their teams. And for all the potential heart attacks he causes, Chicago has not had a quarterback more capable of busting out a big game since... hell, I don't know, McMahon, I guess. And I don't think we've ever had a quarterback who could make those throws to Berrian and Davis.
So relax for a second and realize that we're playing AT HOME next Sunday against a very flawed team that lost 13 games last season. If someone told you at week thirteen that the Bears would get to play the Saints at home for a chance to go to the Super Bowl, wouldn't you have done a backflip on the spot? Well, at least do a cartwheel, or maybe a summersault, because your Bears are one game away from Miami.
January 15, 2007
#37 Dave` said . . .Hear hear.
January 15, 2007
#38 jdawg said . . .Jerry you friggin windbag. Megan started in first. Why can that wannabe man say shit about people and then little homo's like you come on here and defend her.
Sounds like you may have some issues you little women.
And Nick. Are you a real Seahawk fan? Why you on here kissing these chumps asses?
Oh, I get it. I'll bet you're one of those Starbuck pussies who sits around in that fag haven and jumped on Seattle's band wagon when they started to win?
Get off here loser.
But we all know why we're here. This week we talk about how "Da Bears" will get steam rolled by the Saints.
I know we'll hear these candy ass Bear fans talk their crap about how tough Turdwhacker and the defense is and how the offense is going to do this and that.
Thats okay. Say what you want.
Bottom line. The Saints are going to beat you on your own turf. They are the cinderella team.
Its a good story for the NFL. Given what the Saints have been through last year, anything you assholes try to throw at them won't mean shit.
This is bigger then some game. This is their destiny. Its meant to be and you can't stop that.
41-10 Saints
January 15, 2007
#39 Tony said . . .Hey Polish Sausage, word
Hey Dave, yawn
January 15, 2007
#40 Midway Monster said . . .As a Seahawks fan, i want to congratulate the bears on going to the Conference Championship. It was a incredible game to watch and the best team won. I just hope now that the Bears go out and spank the Saints up and down the field and bring home a superbowl championship for the NFC.
January 15, 2007
#41 Midway Monster said . . .Just as I did with the Bird fans: Welcome all the Saints fans to the blog. (oh yeah- the Girl Scouts called... they want their logo back).
--Midway--
January 15, 2007
#42 Midway Monster said . . .Ooopps- my bad.
Its a Boy Scouts logo, not a Girl Scouts.--Midway--
January 15, 2007
#43 Tim said . . .Tanks sack to me was a gem. It killed the Birds drive and and put the Birds out of FG range. To me that was the tipping point. (can you tell I am biased toward the D)
-- (hungover) Midway--
January 15, 2007
#44 Pissed off said . . .Good game for the Bears. I think we're being a little hard on Rex. Of course he looked shaky...for the love of Christ, we're used to watching every pass with baited breath, expecting the worst. He went 21/38...282 yards...1 TD 1 INT...hit 9 different receivers, two of which for 75+ yards...and led the team through a tough as hell game. If any other quarterback not named "Grossman" did this, they'd be getting some respect on Sportscenter.
I'm worried that only one other person hit on the Hester muffs. My buddy said (half) jokingly during the game that Seattle should just punt on first down, put all wide receivers on punt coverage, and wait to recover a fumble. Yeah, he's explosive, yeah, he can score...but we can't afford giveaways in key playoff situations. Throw that guy some stickum or something.
I'm still in disbelief that Fox cut to commercial on that fourth and one measurement.
January 15, 2007
#45 Pissed off said . . .Dave, your a fuckin idiot, find your own place to post. I dish shit out and then steamroll the rebuttals like I steamroll your wife.
January 15, 2007
#46 Pissed off said . . .LG, your a retard, Rex is a franchise quarterback! He has has some problems and probably will continue to have a few stinker games but when he's good, he's real good and I'll take that with the bad. If they win the superbowl nobody will give a fuck what you think about Rex.
January 15, 2007
#47 Pissed off said . . .Right on Scott on post #28, if Rex's statline looks less than perfect, take a peek at the so called superstar QBs of the league in Peyton and Brady, their looking up at Rex right now. I agree, I dont look at ratings this time of year, I look at getting the job done. Great point
January 15, 2007
#48 The Pack is Back said . . .Okay, one more, damn, I had to post for each time I read a stupid comment, mainly Daves comments.
First of all I'm not being a homer but the Hawks played WAYYY over their head yesterday, if they would have played that good last week they would have beat the Cowboys by 25. We overcame more turnovers (which they got points off of) and their average starting field position must have been close to the 40.
To the Rex haters, I think Moose should have brough in the pass that went for a INT. It was a bit behind him but very catchable. The Berrian pass was a sure TD, no question, even dave could have reeled that one in....well probably not cuz he's crosseyed but whatever.
And dont let me forget we had a Hester TD on the punt return and if the guy wouldnt have touched the Seattle player for a penaltly (which he didnt need to do, Hester was already by him) we could have won by 2 scores.
We will be in for good game Sunday, Saints will be fired up but I firmly believe that we can win if we play as hard as we did against Seattle, the only thing killing us right now is the opposing teams field position.
January 15, 2007
#49 The Pack is Back said . . ."I wonder why old PIB can't bring himself to do the honorable thing and admit that he was wrong... as always"
I wasn't wrong. The Pack kicked the bears’ ass! Being the beneficiary of the NFL game resolution system (sudden death) hardly warrants claiming victory, even if the NFL appoints the team as winner.
January 15, 2007
#50 Pissed off said . . ."none is a cockswab like you."
Even the bears' fans that I don't know are cockswabs like you. So it looks like the Pack beats the bears again.
January 15, 2007
#51 mikebdot said . . .Hey, PiB, did you know your team didnt make the playoffs cuz they suck and #4 is well past his prime. Did you also know we won a playoff game cuz we're in the playoffs cuz we're better than you. Did you know you should just look ahead to next season while our team celebrates a birth to the NFC championship game. Did you know that you should stop blogging here and quit while your behind. Did you know that your DELUSIONAL, DISILLUSIONED and DELUDED by you horrible team.
And it appears flowcontrol was the only Hawk fan thats not a big pussy and blogged here after his team lost. I'm still disappointed that he's not gonna hang around so I can rip him, OK maybe he's a pussy too, he got a quick blog in and then left for good, come back and lets talk about that game.
January 15, 2007
#52 Sean said . . .While Reggie Bush scares me a little bit, he fumbled the ball once and dropped a toss as well. Even though he will definitely be less fast and loose with the ball, it's in his nature, and thus I put the chances he fumbles at least once at around 50% next week (especially with the Bears tendency to swarm tackle, especially after making an initial hit to stop a small offender). I'm more concerned about Deuce than Bush running the ball, but screens could hurt us if Bush finds some open space and actually handles the ball like a professional when being caught from behind...
I like our offense to have a few big plays deep, but the story will be the running game. I think we can move the ball on them, it's just going to be a question of how our defense tackles and covers the sure-handed Colston. The key will be pressure on Brees in the passing game and tackling/standing up Bush very quickly after he receives the ball.
Sorry I'm jumping ahead to next week already, but I read Gene W.'s article on espn.com and it is just disgusting.
Does anyone else agree with me about Harris playing poorly? I saw at least 4 plays where he didn't make the tackle when he should have. One play in particular where Alexander was coming through the line and he hardly even got his arm on him. I'm thinking his eyes were closed. He was also aiming for his shoulder. Oh, he took a piss poor angle on another play that allowed a big play...I can't remember which one though...
January 15, 2007
#53 District Selectman said . . .Being a Bears fan, watching the game with a very negative and worrisome Bears' fan (you know who you are DK) I realized something. Worrying about our play is one thing, but constant criticism about how we play is useless. Have faith and remember what we have now is a hell of alot better than Orton, McNown, Mirer, Slash, and the whole host of other useless former dirtbag QBs. This isn't college football. There are no polls. We don't need to blow teams apart. All we have to do is win, and that's what we have done this year. So for everyone who quotes the betting lines, has nothing positive to say, then I guess I am saying don't say anything. The negativity is terrible. When did we as Bears' fans become so expecting of perfection? Enjoy the ride and don't have a heart attack over hypotheticals. We are winning and thats what we gotta love. Be happy for where we are...and the Bears will pull through. Peace! and BEAR DOWN!!!
P.S.--alot less space would be wasted on here if there wasn't mindless trash talk with teams not involved in the playoffs. Don't engage it, its stupid and wastes time having to read real comments from real fans. Lets break down the game and the next opponent!January 15, 2007
#54 Berry Happy said . . .Being the beneficiary of the NFL game resolution system (sudden death) hardly warrants claiming victory, even if the NFL appoints the team as winner."NFL game resolution system"? That is the most unclever thing I've ever heard from a cockswab like you. I understand how the Packers might have problems with the NFL game resolution system, being on the wrong end of it as many times as they were this year. Go back to raping deer or grave robbing or shooting Hmong people, you inbred nebbish.
January 15, 2007
#55 IF, IF, IF... said . . .Yeah, I read Gene's article, and I felt the sudden urge to launch my laptop across the room. Why is it that the pundits can't say, for just one day after a big game, "Congrats. You pulled it out." It's always, "...well, if the Seahawks had this...or if so and so wasn't injured..." Our wins always come with a qualifier of some sort, usually by the sports columnist who picked the other team.
It will be the same way if we make it to the Bowl. It will be...well, the Saints didn't do this, the Saints couldn't do that.
It's never, "the Bears did this well." And while it may be true for some things, doesn't appearing in the NFC championship count for something? In this league of parity, I know there were a few other decent teams in the NFC. You can't just discount the entire conference.
Also, on a side note, what is with all these other fans showing up just to talk trash? It has never occurred to me to go to the Saints board and say horribly demeaning things, but I suppose that's just my Midwestern ethic talking.
January 15, 2007
#56 Jerry said . . .The Bears win. And what do we hear: IF - if this or that...coulda, shoulda, blah, blah, blah. Numerous talking heads and naysayers from LOSING TEAMS keep harping on the "what if?" scenario. Guess what? "What if" did not happen.
So Go back to the first sentence and repeat until you Get it. The Bears WON and are going to host the NFC Championship. Period.
And will go to Miami. No IF's, AND's or BUT's.Here's a realistic prediction: BEARS 30 NO 26
January 15, 2007
#57 dAVE said . . .Dave, I read nowhere Megan starting shit, I wish she would but she is too cool to stoop to your level. I am not to cool, I will get down with the shitheads and you are one.
Now, want to discuss the game and not some studid shit?
January 16, 2007
#58 Mikey said . . .Jerry, you for sure are a product of a brother and sister relationship.
If you were here say back in September, October, you would know.
But since you're some johnny fuck lately I'll give you a pass.
And what the hell is "Studid Shit."
January 16, 2007
It was just revealed that Matt played that game with two broken fingers and a shoulder tear that will most likely require surgery. He may even miss most of training camp.
What's my point? I think you dodged a bullet.
January 17, 2007
Here at DaBearsBlog, you are free to kill us or the Bears as you so wish. You are not free, however, to be an asshole. So if you spew racism or ill-meaning foul language (cursing about football is just fine) or anything of that ilk, your comments ain't gonna last long, jerk.