From ESPN.com
DECATUR, Ill. -- How do you spell Scott Wiese?
In a few weeks, that'd be P-e-y-t-o-n M-a-n-n-i-n-g.
Wiese, a die-hard fan of the Chicago Bears, signed a pledge in front of a crowd at a Decatur bar last Friday night that if the Bears lost Sunday's Super Bowl, he'd change his name to that of the man who led the Indianapolis Colts to victory.
Final score: Colts 29, Bears 17.
So Tuesday, Wiese went to the Macon County Courts Facility and started the process of changing his name.
"I made the bet, and now I've got to keep it," the 26-year-old Wiese said.
Wiese will have to advertise his intention in the local newspaper -- the Herald & Review -- for several weeks and then have a judge give him the OK to become, legally anyway, Peyton Manning.
The men have little in common, Wiese acknowledges.
Manning is 30 years old, stands 6-foot-5 and has a contract with the Colts worth more than $100 million.
Wiese is 5-foot-11 and works at an office-supply store for somewhat less.
"I think I kind of represent all Bears fans," he said. "Not that I'm saying they're all idiots like me, but I represent their passion because I really care about my team, you know?"
#2 Nicole is miserable in this blue city said . . .Gotta love the passion....too bad I didnt think of doing that.
February 8, 2007
#3 Philly Mike said . . .I heard this guy on the Mix this morning with Eric & Kathy.
Right after his interview, a lawyer called and said it will never happen. They will go in there, they'll say he's changing his name because of a bet and better yet that it was made while he was intoxicated, the judge will be pissed that they are wasting his time and it will get thrown out.
What an idiot.
February 8, 2007
#4 Philly Mike said . . .If the guy really had a set of balls he would have changed his name to Rex Grossman.
February 8, 2007
#5 mikebdot said . . .The Bears are holding open tryouts for the quarterback position. Women and children are encouraged to attend.
February 8, 2007
#6 Philly Mike said . . .Re #3:
I wonder if we could convince PO'd to do so if Rex has, say, 12+ turnovers in the first half of next season...maybe 15 to make it a real bet...
February 8, 2007
#7 Midway Monster said . . .Ryan Howard is gonna double Alfonso Soriano's home run total this year too.
February 8, 2007
#8 Philly Mike said . . .I'd do it but my real name is actually Midway Monster :)
--Midway--
February 8, 2007
#9 OHHH NO said . . ."my real name is Midway Monster" .....good stuff lol
February 8, 2007
#10 Coxy said . . .I was just watching the replay of the game and thinking how flawless the colts were sunday. I don't think any NFL team would have won on sunday. At the presentation of the trophy manning had a look on his face that is scary. I've seen that look before Shaq had it Jordan did and brady. The colts just don't have anymore flaws to their game. I think we can do it with more time under grossmens belt, but i gotta believe colts will be all were gonna hear about in years to come. Also Turner needs to go are play calling is just to predictable. There where no draws or screens called that have been the colts worst enemy. Turner called the game like the colts wanted.
February 8, 2007
#11 jeff said . . .Why doesnt Turner ever do Shotgun? Seems as though that would be helpful for Rex, not only with snap that hit him in the difficult spot of right in the palm, but also for more time to see his receivers. Am I wrong?
February 8, 2007
#12 Philly Mike said . . .i live for the shotgun moment. fans always want to fire OCs who don't use shotgun...i think we dont because our passing game is so effective as run-action
February 8, 2007
#13 jdawg said . . .I think the Colts looked a bit flawed when Hester ran back the opening kick for a TD then Manning threw an INT the very next drive. The Bears had a great chance to do some damage but they came out with a pass on first down, run on second, pass on third and long. Very predictable. Coxy, like you said, Turner was that predictable all game. The Colts did not come close to playing perfect game. And, it's a fact that Rex Grossman should have won MVP seeing how he did more than anyone to help the Colts win.
February 8, 2007
#14 Pisse off said . . .Turner doesn't do shotgun because the offense is set up for instant reads at the snap. If the QB's eyes are on the ball and not the D then timing is lost. I'm not saying that's a good reason, its just the reason the Bears give.
Regarding the Colts: The Sporting News had a great article detailing why the Colt's D in the playoffs was no fluke. Earlier they were missing some guys and guys were missing tackles. Both problems were solved, plus they played pissed.
IMO the Colts were peaking coming into the SB and we were too young and/or inexperienced (at more than just the obvious position) to handle it. If anyone has the stomach to watch the coin toss again, check out the look on Olin's face. That was an early sign of trouble. He looked like the mother ship was landing at midfield.
February 8, 2007
#15 Pissed off said . . .Maybe Philly Mike and mikedouchbot cant have that sausage fest together that was talked about, they have a lot in common....they dont know much about football, they desire other men, etc. 12 turnovers isnt enough to make me change name, I like to make real bets....like how long you two can go without fondling each other.
February 8, 2007
#16 Beantown Bear said . . .I'll take the bet that they've fingered each other by the time I finish writing this.....
You guys can rip me all you want, I dont care, I'm just a fan that thinks this:
Those of you who want Rex cut or off the team or shipped to Zimbabwae because he is not an NFL QB, he fumbles too much or throws to many interceptions......I have this to say: Do you not remember the past Decade+ of QB carusel (sp)? He is by far the best QB, with the most potential that we have had since Harbaugh. Lets let him get some experience. THIS WAS HIS FIRST FULL SEASON! Do you not realize that or are you just to pig-headed that you wont accept that, you want Joe Montana to start for the Bears and you want him NOW! Well it aint going to happen. So if we cut him we can have Griese or Orton or Carr lead the team only to be throwing them under the bus by mid season. What an ideal situation...oh yeah we've already been doing that for 13 years.
February 8, 2007
#17 mikebdot said . . .Although it makes me want to puke, i actually agree with PO'd
February 8, 2007
#18 Max said . . .Regardless of the fact that I was the target, I'm quite glad Adam Sandler has made "douchebag" a frequent word to insult someone...toll booth willy style
Re: PO'd, in my best Nixon voice, "I am not a douche"...
P.S. I'll let the comment that I know nothing about football slide...I'd much rather argue on the merits, which you apparently don't want to do as you keep cutting and pasting the same one over and over...which adds about as much value as PIB...
February 8, 2007
#19 mikebdot said . . .I'll third that in regards to Rex staying and our miserable QB's recently. Give the kid this year. His contract year. If he is blowing goats by game 6-8, put in Griese. But there is to much potential there to not give him a little more time to develop.
I'll make a bet: Bears make the playoffs next year, I'll change my name to Cade EDITED BY JEFF.
p.s. I apologize for using his name on the blog
February 8, 2007
#20 Philly Mike said . . .Max: Please define "blowing goats" in football terms, rather than Wayne's world ones. Should there not be some criteria that is set? It doesn't have to be stats necessarily, but this is the same thing I argued and am apparently labeled a Rex hater for (by PO'd). I don't hate Rex. I hope to god that he takes our team next year and we go 7-0 again, but if we don't and he's part of the reason, we ought to be prepared for this...
I liked the idea of drafting Leak. That would be fun.
February 8, 2007
#21 Midway Monster said . . .Maybe you're right. I don't know anything about football. But, I'm not the one hanging from Rex's little balls and defending him because you are his fan. Learn to be objective my friend, the road of denial is a long and dangerous one. You are a true homer. If Rex played for the Packers you would hang him out to dry without doubt.
February 8, 2007
#22 Nicole is miserable in this blue city said . . .Pissed off:
You have me almost in your camp on Rex. Good contributions... Maybe I need to review the game films also... But it will break my heart.
The thing is, if we stick with him, how bad will the boo's pour out of the fan base on his first screw up game. I figure he would have a few in 07 don't you?
--Midway--
February 8, 2007
#23 Philly Mike said . . .Midway- how was the jello after your therapy session last night?
Rex isn't going anywhere so we may as well accept it and bear down.
February 8, 2007
#24 mikebdot said . . .I can totally understand sticking by your QB during the season, especially when your squad is playing as well as the Bears did this year. But, looking at the talent the Bears have, which is almost mind blowing, how can you possibly put in a QB that is known for self destruction? How can the Bears believe they don't need a QB? I think they KNOW they need a QB, and I'm gonna name a few NFC quarterbacks I think would have beaten Indy if they played with this talent loaded Bears team:
Starting in the NFC West:Hasselbeck, Bulger
I didn't add Matt Leinart or Alex Smith because of their inexperience, but they have the potential to be a very solid QB's in this league...and both are better pure QB's than Grossman. I would take either of them right now over Rex.
NFC North:Favre, Kitna
NFC South:
Vick, Brees, Delhomme
NFC East:
McNabb, Manning, Romo.
Poor Rex, he's a mess.February 8, 2007
#25 thegreenmenace said . . .Phillymike:
I don't agree with most of those names, specifically Manning, Favre, Kitna, Romo, and McNabb (as he was hurt). The others are possibly arguable, but I actually like our chances with Rex. I'm just saying be prepared if the first half of the season sucks because of him...Boy scout style.
February 8, 2007
#26 Pissed off said . . .to philly mike:
I don't mean to pick on your post, but what is the point of saying that there are 10 QBs in the league that may (or may not) have beaten the Colts in Super Bowl XLI? None of them are free agents (that we would want even if we could afford it).
Its like saying there are 87 QBs in the history of the NFL that could have beaten the Colts in Super Bowl XLI, or there are 1,412 QBs in the history of football (including Europe and Canada) that could have beaten the Colts in Super Bowl XLI.
Hell, Rex of the first 6/7 games could have beaten the Colts , too and thats why we will stick with him. Of course sticking with him doesn't mean he has the job, he still has to fight for it.
PS. Anyone have more info on the rumor that Grossman was out on the town Friday and Saturday night? http://kissmesuzy.blogspot.com/2007/02/ksk-blind-item-drunk-before-super-bowl.html
February 8, 2007
#27 Pissed off said . . .I'm sorry it makes you sick to be in my camp on some issues but dont make me post the same thing again. I'll do it.
You can all keep hating on him and saying I'm his boy but I'm not, I'm being objective, I've said he has flaws and if he continues to struggle I want him out too but Philly Mike and some others are the ones that keep saying the same things. YOUR NOT BEING OBJECTIVE! Its not me, its you......you are the ones not being objective. Come up with something other than "he blew the super bowl". Try looking at some of his good games and see his potential in HIS FIRST FULL SEASON. Fuck, your guys are like a broken record.
Also if we're taking a toll it appears most of you agree with me on Rex.(except one, Philly) and that guy has already proven he doesnt know what side of the issue he wants to take anyway, read his posts yesterday he said the bears dont have a shot at the NFC title game and then his next post says they have a good chance to go the the SB. Go ahead, go back and read it.
February 8, 2007
#28 Midway Monster said . . .Jeff,
What happened to WRs and TEs today? I'm interested to see what you have to say, hopefully its more like the RBs take and less like the QBs take you posted......j/k
February 8, 2007
#29 Philly Mike said . . .Nicole is miserable in this blue city:
Every time I take a step forward, I find myself 2 back. I have images of pee-wee mistakes (balloon passes and mis-snaps) burned into the projector system of my brain.
That said, Group is going well & the white robe they give us here is comfy. The doc says I am progressing and 50% of us in Group have gotten beyond the first step: "admit there is a problem". Unfortunately I am not one of them... so they just pat my head and give me a Dixie cup with more meds....
--Midway--
February 8, 2007
#30 thegreenmenace said . . .My point is that it's a shame that the best team hands down in the NFC has a QB that is a detriment to the offense. The Bears aren't my favorite team, but I do root for them. But I think I AM BEING OBJECTIVE when I say they are a fantastic team even though I am an Eagles fan. Just imagine how good the Bears would look going into next year with a guy over center who can actually see over the line.
February 8, 2007
#31 thegreenmenace said . . .Just thought you'd appreciate that Manning's dad's advice for the Bears is to not give up on Grossman.
http://chicagosports.chicagotribune.com/sports/football/bears/cs-0702060269feb06,1,317271.story?coll=cs-football-print
Though I don't really appreciate any Manning talking about the Bears, or anybody talking about Rex right now-the comparison of Rex and Eli are interesting.February 8, 2007
#32 Pissed off said . . .Philly Mike:
I commented on your post because you are naming QBs that are not even available, not because you are talking smack about Rex. I mean seriously, whether or not you want to be objective is fine, but can we have a rule that being rational is perquisite for posting?
Qbs that are attainable:
Garcia (he won't backup though)
Plummer ( and Stewart isn't around to screw that up again)
Carr (if the Texans go with Plummer or someone else)
Schaub (that reminds me I should start thinking about my retirement plan)
McNabb (I dunno, I just thought I should add another name to the list)
Personally I'd keep my money for the D and stick with Rex unless he looks worse next year.
February 8, 2007
#33 thegreenmenace said . . .I have an idea Philly, why dont you go to an eagles blog and state your opinions there, or have you already done that and been ripped severly and now your coming on here to spread your nonsense. I AM OFFICIALLY DONE READING YOUR POSTS. Feel free to rip me or Grossman all you want now knowing that there will be no retaliation from me. Your posts are all over the place, you dont know what you want you just like to rip Grossman.
Now for other matters, I was thinking about this David Carr thing....my wife claims she is a Texans fan (just to get on my nerves but she really likes the Bears) ever since their first season 4 years ago (or whenever it was). And David Carr is the only player on that team she knows so if we get him I'm really gonna hear it. That being said I'm not to worried.
February 8, 2007
#34 Boston George said . . .What is it that Philly has against Rex? The 76ers hate Rex: http://sportsyenta.blogspot.com/2007/02/philadelphia-76ers-hate-rex-grossman.html
February 8, 2007
#35 Boston George said . . .I'm a Chicago transplant living in the Boston area now for 4 years. I see the tradition this town has since the Pats have won three super bowls. This year, I was so pumped to have some ammunition to go into work and do a little bragging. That being said, the Pats fans around here are actually very fun people and I enjoy the competitive banter we have. When I look at our offense in Chicago, I agree with most of the posts that we do have a very nice receiving group along with two solid backs and a nice O Line. The defense speaks for itself , we know they'll do their job. But, to be honest, as much as I would absolutely love to see Rex prosper as a Chicago Bear, I don't think it will ever happen. I think he has alot of the qualities an NFL quarterback needs to possess, however he is mistake prone. He has a tendency to do the worst thing possible on every play. I don't want to sound like I dislike Rex because I do not. I want nothing more than for him to grow and become a serviceable quarterback. I just don't see it happening. So, I guess the question is, are we depending on Brian Griese when Grossman ultimately fails? Or Kyle Orton?? Someone please console me and give me reasons not to worry about our quarterback situation!!!!
February 8, 2007
#36 Still Depressed.... said . . .Has anyone actually heard any truth about McNabb for a first round pick? I forgot to put that in my comment. I'm guessing it's not a probable scenario, but I guess a man can dream.
February 8, 2007
#37 Pissed off said . . .I've heard a couple of rumors about the McNabb thing, but there's no way Philly gives him up. There's just not enough good QB's out there for them to trade him. Maybe if the Bears threw in rex with a first rounder the eagles would accept..lol
February 8, 2007
#38 Pissed off said . . .I wouldnt give a high first round pick for McNabb but probably a later one.
I dont think your being objective George..."rex has a tendency to do the worst possible thing on EVERY play?" Maybe your right those 23 reg season Tds and 3 more playoff Td's sure were the wost thing he could have done on those particular plays. Lets not generalize OK, get REAL! I understand you think Rex will fail, and to answer you question if he does I think we must rely on Griese, thats why we paid him big bucks.
And since I havent seen you around here before I have a comment I like to keep posting so I'll post it for you to read: maybe this will ease your mind:
Those of you who want Rex cut or off the team or shipped to Zimbabwae because he is not an NFL QB, he fumbles too much or throws to many interceptions......I have this to say: Do you not remember the past Decade+ of QB carusel (sp)? He is by far the best QB, with the most potential that we have had since Harbaugh. Lets let him get some experience. THIS WAS HIS FIRST FULL SEASON! Do you not realize that or are you just to pig-headed that you wont accept that, you want Joe Montana to start for the Bears and you want him NOW! Well it aint going to happen. So if we cut him we can have Griese or Orton or Carr lead the team only to be throwing them under the bus by mid season. What an ideal situation...oh yeah we've already been doing that for 13 years.
February 8, 2007
#39 Boston George said . . .With all do respect, the Bears would never trade Rex AND a first round pick for McNabb. That would be the steal of the century for Philly if they could pull that off.
February 8, 2007
#40 Philly Mike said . . .I don't see all that much potential in Rex. It's not that he doesn't have the capability because I think he does. but the situation has to be addressed and since the Bears front office is obviously expoloring their options for the QB position, I think we need to realize that Rex probably isn't the best fit for this team, no matter how much we like or dislike him.
February 8, 2007
#41 Philly Mike said . . .I said the same thing. You don't get into the NFL without having talent...especially as a QB. But, just like NFL scouts reported when he came out from Florida, they had doubts about his size and deep ball accuracy.
February 8, 2007
#42 Pissed off said . . .LOL....."steal of the century for Philly" - the fact that you just actually said that proves you are Rex's ultimate ass buddy. That is by far the most ridiculous thing ever said about a trade....even by someone from Chicago. "steal of the century" oh my goodness that's precious. LOL
February 8, 2007
#43 Pissed Off said . . .Boston, I really dont think the Bears are shopping for a QB, they have Rex, find me an article that says they are. Some poeople on here are just speculating that they are.
February 8, 2007
I wanna play with Rex's tiny dick.
February 9, 2007
Here at DaBearsBlog, you are free to kill us or the Bears as you so wish. You are not free, however, to be an asshole. So if you spew racism or ill-meaning foul language (cursing about football is just fine) or anything of that ilk, your comments ain't gonna last long, jerk.