Keyshawn Johnson is a brilliant football commentator, as anyone who sat through day one of the draft can attest to. But on the football field, his production has never quite kept up-to-speed with his mouth. He's something of an enigma: a guy who can catch 100 balls for 2 touchdowns. But one thing is non-negotiable...Keyshawn Johnson is one of the toughest wide receivers in the game.
There will be league-wide interest in Mrs. Wayne Chrebet this week and I'm of the mindset the Bears should throw their hat in the ring. Every move this team makes should in some way be about helping their flimsier-than-Phil Spector's defense quarterback get through next season. Keyshawn not only would add a big-body, great-hands first down target for Rex - he'd instill some of the leadership fire that was traded to the Jets for a second round swap.
Will the Bears do it? Not likely. But a boy can dream, can't he?
#2 Midway Monster said . . .I don't know. I really hate loud mouths who are all talk and no game. I say forget it bud.
Speaking of foul mouths... I see that the front page of today's Chicago Sun-Times is column write up (Carol Slezak ) expresses outrage that the Bears' first-round draft pick was a member of a foul mouth rap group during his college freshman year in college, and that the group had 'naughty' lyrics. Obviously she has never been on a field where foul mouths run rampid!
--Midway--
(rehab)May 2, 2007
#3 jdawg said . . .On that note, PO- can you write up some good rap lyrics for us?
--Midway--
(rehab)May 2, 2007
#4 Pissed off said . . .We already have him and his name is Moose.
Please remember that Wolfe is basically Reggie Bush-lite. He will run out of the backfield, he will come out of the backfield on passing plays and he will probably line up in the slot on occasion. Plug in Olsen into that equation and our whole receiving corps has been upgraded without drafting a receiver.
May 2, 2007
#5 mikebdot said . . .My thoughts exactly. See my previous post on the "Fire Jay Mariotti" blog page.
To Phil, I hate Randy Moss, I hate what he brings to the team and I for one am glad we didnt get him. I think the team is smarter than that to go after a cancer like Randy. Key on the other hand would be fine with me, he doesnt cause problems, he fires guys up.
I'll see what I can come up with in the way of rap, but I must warn you...it might be "naughty". I know you wouldnt expect anything less from me.
May 2, 2007
#6 Midway Monster said . . .Posted this on the other thread, thought it was interesting enough to say, "hmmm":
We also signed Dave Ball [New Hampshire - broke Jerry Rice's TD record at Div I-AA] (6'1 - 196) and Drisan James [Boise State] (5'11 - 186) and Jayson Swain [Tenn] (6'1 - 205)
http://www.nfl.com/draft/profiles/2007/ball_david
No profiles for other two guys on nfl.com. Found their height/weight at their college sites, no real info to share there though.
Also noting, I'm almost excited about Ball...seems like he could be a Ricky Proehl type guy...one can hope I suppose.
May 2, 2007
#7 Al in WI said . . .Lyrics:
First things first, I poppa, freaks all the scorin;
Dummies, safety bunnies, those wantin’ money
I run by them and they don’t get nathan’
Even do I am a ungly mo%^er F$#&er.TD - rock yo hips
TD - rock yo hipsTRANSLATION:
As a general rule, I am a top athlete who can score on many of the established defenses of today's NFL , including but not limited to those defenses who are ranked very highly. Although I am extremely unattractive, I am able to engage many defensives with fake moves to be successful. When I score I perform a dance.
--Midway--
(definately in rehab today)
May 2, 2007
#8 Pissed off said . . .Jeff, on chicagobears.com they are reporting that Olsen is going to where 82 for the Bears. Here is the story: http://www.chicagobears.com/news/ChalkTalkStory.asp?story_id=3376
May 2, 2007
#9 Max said . . .I got a small cock, Greg Olsen's soon to be on the trade block. Call me whack, but I like to lick my man's ass crack. But, for me to be happy, all I need is sex.... SEX FROM REX
May 2, 2007
#10 Pissed off said . . .I like the Ball signing alot. In fact, I am really happy with all the Bears undrafted free agent signings. We are bringing alot of people who have chips on their shoulders cause they werent drafted and they all are going to want to prove something. Leak, Walker, and now Ball. Makes me pretty excited.
My nick name is Big play Rashied,
im here to stay and maybe take the lead.
i bust out corners cause they jump the read
and take it to the house and watch em bleedMay 2, 2007
#11 Pissed Off said . . .#8 was obviously not me, some pussy can identify him/herself and actually debate me if he or she comes clean. I must have hurt someones feelings. Awwww.
May 2, 2007
#12 jdawg said . . .Midway says Fuck Key, Me and Jeff say he'll fit to a tee, I dont mind him talkin smack, if he's got this Super Bowl team's back, Key's been a dud but known sometimes as a stud, I'll take his shit if he scores for a bit.
I cant believe some douche stole my name, If I find him I'll be bashing his brain, Fuck Greg-O and his "naughty" rap, no one cares....its funny that crap, If he can score and catch the ball, then I say fuck y'all.May 2, 2007
#13 Megan said . . .you know its hrd, oops, I mean hard, to type with this five pound alarm clock hanging around my neck.
fck, I can barely move.
I just ho, I mean hope, Wolfe gets a cracker, oops, I mean crack, at the slot. He's got a lot of wigguh, I mean wiggle, in his step.
Well, its hot some I need me some Vanilla Ice, I mean Vanilla Ice Cream.
word to your mother, I mean muther.
May 2, 2007
#14 Megan said . . .Jeff, you are freakin' kidding me. Keyshawn?? WTF dude?
Word to yo' mutha,
got no time for you brutha,
gotta catch that 'skin
the way it's commin' in.
To my hands, it flies
like spiral dynamite.
gotta catch,
gotta catch (scratch scratch scratch )
Runnin' to the line,
drivin' down in time.
Now I gotta dance, cuz I've just scored on yo ass!that's all I got, PEACE!
K, that is not as good as my hiaku.
May 2, 2007
#15 Decatur Staleys #7 said . . .Okay, the more I thought about it the more interesting Key sounded... *sigh* one year just for glory, I guess. It's kinda like picking up a Moss character, just for 0ne year, right? I just don't like that loud-mouth, then, you guys all know how I feel about loud mouths.. ahem.
(I sound like Eyore from Winnie-the-Pooh when I read that)
May 2, 2007
#16 Brian Urlacher said . . .I think it would be a step backward for our WR having to deffer to him in there development.
Whose place is he going to take on the roster?
Everytime a semi marquee name comes up,we feel that they can help.Most time there on the dowmside of their career.I'm tired of signing these guys with no upside.
An it's still early I'm sure there will be some more guy cut that could be more productive then "Me-Shawn"
Possible nicknames for Olsen"Googles" or "GregEX"
pun on FedEx,because he better deliver.May 2, 2007
#17 Al in WI said . . .My Rap
******
Escape me? Never yo-
While I am I, and yo are yo-
And while yo are running wid da ball-
I'll hunt you down and kill yo-
I'll hunt hunt hunt hunt yo and kill kill kill yoand I'll thow yo ma-ma down the basement steps.
May 3, 2007
#18 Pissed off said . . .Have to agree with #7, some of the logic seems odd to me. Just days before the draft, there was a post declaring "Fuck anyone," who wants a wide out. Including bashing anyone who was interested in Marty Booker, because he is a "retread." Now two individuals who wrote, and supported that post want us to sign a 11 year vet on his 4th or 5th team? That doesn't make much sense at all.
May 3, 2007
#19 Al in WI said . . .OK then
May 3, 2007
#20 Phil from SATX said . . .Decatur Staleys #7 is who I was agreeing with.
May 3, 2007
#21 mikebdot said . . .That was a very funny response, PO'd. Al and Jdawg have it right, I think, with the addition of GO-gurt and LBW (that's the Little Bad Wolfe) there are passcatching weapons aplenty - and that's not counting the possibility of adding Hester to the mix.
Reminds me of the Bears' rationale last year to the hating thrown at them for not picking offense in the draft - they said they already had players on the roster, we'll appreciate them when they're healthy. Bradley unfortunately went back on the injured heap and he was to be an important weapon. We'll see if he can make it this season. Are any of the undrafted free agent additions a possibility to be the burner to complement Berrian that the BT wants? If Bradley is healthy that should be him, although I don't remember too many Berrian/Bradley sets during last season. Any thoughts?
May 3, 2007
#22 mikebdot said . . .We did not utilize our talent at WR because "we are a running football team". I don't like declaring that. It's not good tactics. Why not have entire games where we do one to open the other and then switch it up a few games later. I think that is the beauty of our team, we can do either, especially if Rex's full year #2 shows improvement (does 2 or 3 absolutely abysmal games mean he would be "improved"? I hope the standard isn't set that low...that has been my only concern in every post that has been tangentially related to Rex)
In any event, I think we have the WRs we need, especially with two fully capable tight ends. I envision us using double wide out sets that could be used for run or for the pass. I like the versatility factor. We would be even more versatile if we ran some 5 wideout sets every so often. Bradley, Berrian, Moose, Wolfe, Olsen...or Moose, Berrian, Hester, Olsen, Clark...or...you get the idea...we have so many weapons. Let's see, Bradley, Berrian, Moose, Rashied, Wolfe, Olsen, Hester, Clark, any of the free agents that might step up...that's at least 8 to choose from. Damn. We can play all sorts of match up games if we feel like it. Hopefully Turner won't just be humdrum do two receiver sets most of the time. I would be really pissed.
May 3, 2007
#23 mikebdot said . . .I meant to say doube tight end sets, not wideout.
May 3, 2007
#24 Phil from SATX said . . .I meant to say doube tight end sets, not wideout. (in 2nd sentence of second paragraph)
May 3, 2007
#25 Bearfan34 said . . .I'm going to pose another question to Those Who Have Knowledge. Is there any precedent for teams who employ 2 great tight ends? If so, what kind of success did they have? I realize that it may be premature to label GO Dog GO (hey that one's pretty good) as a great tight end and it may be a little stretch to label Dez the same, but still... does any other team have anything to rival the projected Bears tandem of 2007?
May 3, 2007
#26 DTB said . . .I honestly think Keyshawn could contribute to the team, but he would be another Moose. Moose has experience and the big body as Keyshawn, so what would we be gaining?
We're all forgetting that he's caused trouble on almost every team he's played for. We do not need that in Chicago. I'll take Bernard, Moose, R.Davis, and Mark Bradley over Keyshawn!
As always,
Bear Down!
May 3, 2007
#27 Al in WI said . . .Keyshawn is not a Bear. I see him landing in San Diego with the prescription drug dealer and the juice monster. Besides nothing would make happier than Peanut locking him down on September 9th, in San Diego. Step one on Tillman's march to Honolulu!
May 3, 2007
#28 said . . .To Phil,
The packers used the formation quite well in the mi-90's with Keith Jackson and Mark Chumura, that was the basis for Favre's MVP run at that time. It worked well because the D doesn't know if you're going to run or pass.May 3, 2007
#29 Pissed off said . . .HEY AL, Read my post #24 under the "Fire Jay Mariotti" blog page before you go running your mouth. Dont come here and bash what I've said without reading all my responses first. Thats just being ignorant if you choose to read some posts and not others. If you have a problem with what I said on that post then lets debate it but dont come and say stupid shit without knowing my full opinion.
To Phil, I wouldnt necassarily consider our TE tandem (Dez and Greg) to be great. Not yet. Dez had a good year but he is by no means great, heck he's not even a pro bowler and I think you at least need to be a pro bowl caliber TE to be great. Greg is probably a sure thing but he hasnt taken a snap in the NFL yet so I'm not going to label him "great".....yet! That aside, back to your original question I cant think of a great TE tandem in recent years. The colts have a couple of good ones and they won the SB if that answers your question. But I guess those two for Indy arent "great".
May 3, 2007
#30 mikebdot said . . .#28 is me, Its getting closer to football season, Im getting pisseder
May 3, 2007
#31 Al in WI said . . .Clark is Indy's only good TE. Utecht is awful. I don't think either is a true tight end as they usually line up in the slot. The reason they are any good is because of the system (i.e. their no huddle). Also, they don't typically run two TE sets.
May 3, 2007
#32 Pissed off said . . .I'd say, mabey it's time to change your pad.
Mabey YOU should go back and read your post again. In it claimed that not only did you not want a wr in the draft, but you didn't want some "retread," like Marty Booker. So what exactly is Keyshawn Johnson but a retread who is three year older and looking for his 5th team?
My point stands.May 3, 2007
#33 Decatur Staleys #7 said . . .Negative, Al I'll debate you all day. Keyshawn is not Booker, he doesnt suck like Booker. Keyshawn was a bonafide pro bowler. His numbers are far better than Bookers and he's a bigger target with better hands, etc. What else do I need to explain to you. His career is winding down but its like the Shaq thing, give the guy one last hurah while hes got some talent left. The Miami heat won the NBA title last year with Shaq, who's at the end. And by retread I also meant I dont want a guy back who we have already had and didnt work when he was here. DUH.
May 3, 2007
#34 Max said . . .I think it's funny "Me Shawn" agent says he already got 7 offer on the table.I almost spit my coffee into my monitor.
May 3, 2007
#35 Al in WI said . . .I don't know about the hands thing PO'ed. Booker, when playing for the Bears in 2001, caught a hundred passes and it was due in some part to his large hands.
But I still agree with Keyshawn over Marty. Just thought id point that out.
IN OTHER NEWS:
Eagles signed Ian Scott to a one year deal, $1 million dollar deal accorind to NFL.com
May 3, 2007
#36 JB said . . .Once again you are missing my point. I'm not saying we should sign Booker. I was simply referring back to your own post where you argued that we are set at wr and don't need another one. Either draft pick or veteran. I had on a previous post mentioned that he was available.
My position is clear; for the past couple months on this site I have argued for a big physical receiver with jump ball ability to be added to the Bears. This is a position that you disagreed with, and challenged me on several times.
I used as my example Marcus Robinson from ’99 and what he was able to do with mediocre quarterback’s and how he was able to make them look good by out jumping defenders and making plays. You then attacked me for this, claiming that I wanted Marcus Robinson back on the team. Which I do not! I simply think that he is the type of receiver we need to add, as he would aid Rex quite a bit.
In that comment (#24 Jay) you then made the same argument that you had attacked me for, only you used Plaxico from the Giants.My point on the Booker/Keyshawn issue is that they are the same player. Only Booker, a former Pro Bowl wide out for the Chicago Bears, is three years younger. Johnson has not had a thousand yard season in 5 years. And he does not fit the bill as a jump ball vertical threat because he is slow and has declined greatly the past few years.
It is one thing to change your mind on an issue, or to favor one free agent over another. But is quite another thing to attack someone and tell them to fuck off because they disagree with you and then switch sides not even a week later.
May 3, 2007
#37 Al in WI said . . .Al & Po'd, I want to break away from this argument, however enjoyable it may be, and remind you that Greg Olsen is a Chicago Bear. Greg Olsen runs a 4.51, stands 6'6", and can stretch the middle of the field. Greg Olsen is the "best in the Shockey, Winslow line" according to people in the know at Miami. Greg Olsen fell to us at 31 and we didn't have to give anything up to get him. Greg Olsen appears to eat, drink, and sleep football. Greg Olsen has promised to get into camp and work hard from day 1. Greg Olsen is going to be Rex Grossman's best friend. Greg Olsen is going to be the key to getting back to the SB and winning the damn thing. In short, I already love Greg Olsen, and he hasn't even put on the pads.
I already sent his information to Canton, they're getting his bronze bust and ugly jacket ready for the class of 2027
May 3, 2007
#38 Megan said . . .Jb, Agree with you totally on Olsen, I am a big fan of that move. I think Olsen will really help Grossman and the Bears passing game.
May 3, 2007
#39 ROCCO said . . .The testosterone is swelling, it must be close to mini-camp...
But, alas, I still love you guysMay 3, 2007
#40 Pissed off said . . .Keyshawn can't play anymore. He should be happy he got the $3 Million roster bonus and just walk away. He's washed up. Anyway, he would hand Rex his little balls the first time Rex underthrows him by 10 yards (which is just about every time he throws).
May 4, 2007
#41 Phil from SATX said . . .I guess we'll have to agree to disagree. I have bashed the idea of getting Robinson, or Booker and I have endorsed getting Keyshawn only because I think Keyshawn is a better WR than both of those guys over his career and I dont think Booker/Key are the same guy. I want him for one year, thats it. Robinson or Booker would demand more than a 1 year contract. Yes he is a shell of what he used to be and he's getting old but he's a bigger target than most WR in the NFL including Booker and about 100 other guys and Rex could use that. It doesnt surprise me that Key has 7 offers already. I would like the guy on the team, so what.
May 4, 2007
#42 Pissed off said . . .Love the post JB. Exception taken from down south on comments on Booker - he sucks? he didn't work out in Chicago? My memory, while admittedly declining, tells me that I loved Marty Booker and was very pissed at management when he left - he was a great Bear while he was here and truly among the best receivers we've had in the modern era - maybe not saying all that much, but still, no need to throw Booker under the bus just because he's no longer a Bear.
But your argument just highlights the fact that we're in another no-news post-draft lull.
We need fresh meat! Who's got some?
May 4, 2007
#43 Phil from SATX said . . .Marty Booker had a couple good years here, he was not as consistently good as Keyshawn throughout his career. Booker had a good year last year too, but before that....nothing for about 5 years. You all would be agreeing with me if Booker didnt have a good year last year. He'll go back to being mediocre serviceable at best again this year like he was for most of his career with the exception of 3 seasons. He really only broke out again last year because so much focus goes on Chambers. And Robinson, pah-lease, he had 1 good year.
Also when was the last time a great TE actually put a team over the hump for a SB team. JB and Phil your making it sound like because we have Olsen we are a lock for the SB. I believe man, I do but I dont think Greg is the only reason thats going to get us over the hump. The ball only gets passed so many times, the receptions he makes are just being taken away from others. I think an improved team, coupled with Rexs experience and yes...some off season pickups (including Greg) will get us there.
May 4, 2007
#44 DTB said . . .I don't think you're really disagreeing with anything, PO'd - we are going to win the Super Bowl next year as long as Rex improves, and I'm on record as having shaken my SB hangover about Rex. (Remember those fights? Seems long ago now).
Logic now tells me Rex is going to improve. But Greg Olsen is probably the single best one-man draft addition he could have gotten - he's the biggest offensive target in the entire draft and he should therefore be forgiving of less than pinpoint accuracy. Having said that, I don't think accuracy was Rex's issue (more like Orton's) - his issue was what he did with the ball when under pressure. When he has time and his wits about him, he's one of the most accurate passers out there.
So we're really all on the same page here - the Bears are returning a top 3 team with two key additions in the offseason - Olsen and Archuleta. Super Bowl does indeed await! It's a great time to be a Bear fan!
May 4, 2007
#45 Pissed off said . . .Now, good ole Lenny has reported that according to several sources around the NFL the Bears are shopping Alex Brown. With solid production against the run, quality pass rush and his minimal cap hit why would we even concider getting rid of him. If anything, dump Wale and his engourged contract.
May 4, 2007
#46 jdawg said . . .I would agree with that DTB, not to mention it would fall right in line with the bears cheapness. Right now we have 4 ends, one unproven. If we dump Wale we would still have 3 ends, 2 who are proven and could start. Who knows with this Bazuin kid but maybe he'll be good. I'm in favor of keeping them all though. I like Alex, he may be better than Wale anyway. Who knows
May 4, 2007
#47 Decatur Staleys #7 said . . .You know, I'd hate to see Brown go. He seems like one of the nicest guys on the team from what I've read about him, plus he's not that big of a cap hit. I'd rather see Idonidge (sp?) go.
Now, as for naming a TE that took a team over the top, that's a tough call. Would the Cowboy's have won 3 titles without Novacek? What about NE with what's-his-name? Green Bay had a great TE tandem when they won it all.
Anyway, like its been mentioned, Olsen's impact could go beyond his stats, sort of like Ben W with the Bulls.
May 4, 2007
#48 Max said . . .Here's a tidbit from the Sun Times in regards to Alex Brown
Angelo didn't invest a high pick in Bazuin to watch him grow during practice, so the Bears probably are still working to trade Brown, as they were entering the draft. Word is that that it wasn't the Bears' asking price that prevented a deal from getting done, but rather the contract demands of Brown, who is believed to want more than $10 million guaranteed in a new deal. He's under contract to the Bears for three more years in a modest five-year deal he signed in December 2004 for a base amount of $11 million with escalators that could kick it to $16 million.
It's never about winning,
It's always about money with this team,Huh?May 6, 2007
#49 Pissed off said . . .Its always about the money with every team.
May 6, 2007
#50 mikebdot said . . .You know I went back and re-read Jeffs post here and its still a great take, except the Rex bashing of course cuz he's gonna be real good real soon and you'll all regret the Rex hating. Whats the latest on Keyshawn? Does anyone know?
May 8, 2007
#51 JB said . . .I'm liking this David Ball guy. "Uncle Ben". You know, "white rice". That's fun. I want to see him catch a pass just so I can use that. The idea of "fresh meat" is very appealing.
May 8, 2007
#52 Decatur Staleys #7 said . . .Just an FYI, my favorite player growing up was Tom Waddle. I still wear the autographed #87 jersey I got when I was in middle school (I thought ahead and bought it big) to establish instant street cred at a new Bears bar...make sure everyone knows I'm not a bandwagoner.
When I was in high school, he came and gave a motivational talk to our school and I wore the jersey. I talked to him afterwards and he said that I was probably the only person that owns an autographed tom waddle jersey...which he said devalued the jersey so that no one would want it.
So, I guess I'm thinking if we could get another guy like that on the team, I'd be all for it...I'm not sure he fits in the scheme but then again, there's a reason I'm typing on this blog and not wearing a head set on Sundays.
BTW, after further investigating the players we got in the draft, I really love it. I loved it after Olsen as you all know, but Okwo and Payne look like guys that will be considered steals in the next few years. Anyone else notice the stocking of DB's?!?! Anybody got anything new to talk about?
May 8, 2007
#53 jdawg said . . .Yeah I notice the stock pile of DB's we've been getting.With P'Nut an Vash up for contracts,An now facing Williams an Johnson for the Lions.It looks like the NFC North is stock piling WR & RB to beat our D.
It feel good to be the hunted in this division again.May 8, 2007
#54 mikebdot said . . .Word out of camp is Olsen runs and catches like a wide reciever -- that's 6'5" and 250 lbs. Wolfe moves like a spider and Payne has the right last name. Yeah, Ball is supposed to have soft hands made out of glue, but may not be fast enough, we'll see. That other tight end makes things interesting. We can't keep 4 and we need Gilmore to block.
May 8, 2007
#55 Jordka said . . .Clark can block fairly well. Also, Olsen will develop into a good blocking TE. I guarantee it. There is no reason he can't at his size, and since that is the case, the Halas gods will certainly bless us with any needed ability at the position.
May 8, 2007
#56 JB said . . .Is it a possible to trade Briggs to KC for Green? This is a short term answer, but coudl put us over the edge this year.
May 9, 2007
#57 Max said . . .Jordka, I'm not sure why I am responding to this thought, but I'll do it.
Trading Briggs for Green would be ridiculous. 1st of all, he'd be the 3rd best QB on the roster behind Grossman and Griese (he's getting replaced by Kyle Orton's twin basically).
Next, trade value for Green was 4th round, Briggs value was mid-first.
Finally, Rex Grossman will be in the ProBowl this year...QB IS NOT A PROBLEM....GET OVER IT. As you all know, I am driving the Rex for MVP bus now so get in, sit down, and enjoy the ride.
Between Jamaar and Okwo, OLB is not a problem either. If we trade Briggs fine, if he sits fine, if he plays fine...it doesn't matter, the BT has moved past this issue. We're not talking about Urlacher, we're talking about a system guy who we have already drafted a replacement for.
I guess I've become an optomist about next year, but seriously, it looks good...the grass is a nice green color, come on over to my side and enjoy it.
May 9, 2007
#58 Pissed off said . . .I'm down for the bus JB, as long as its BYOB and i dont get in trouble for throwing sandwiches at the bus driver. . . and screaming RASHIED out the windows at every stoplight.
May 10, 2007
#59 JB said . . .I'd say Green might be 4th best after Leak. That is a crazy ass idea Jordka, indeed doesnt deserve a response. Even if we needed a QB which we dont, Briggs value is far too high for getting just Green.
I am shotgun on that Rex bandwagon and I might have to fight JB to take over the wheel. I might get annoyed by the constant yelling of "rashied" but I'll have my Ipod on listening to the rap version of "bear down." I say we all pitch in to get a keg instead of BYBO, that's a more economical way to drink.
May 10, 2007
#60 Keyshawn said . . .Max, why would you get in trouble throwing sandwiches...i love sandwiches...PO'd, I'm down for the keg...what kind of beer?
May 10, 2007
#61 tytbtxihpe said . . .No way is my ass playing for a team qb'd by a midget.
May 10, 2007
Hello! Good Site! Thanks you! qdlwtcclqdspjo
July 2, 2007
Here at DaBearsBlog, you are free to kill us or the Bears as you so wish. You are not free, however, to be an asshole. So if you spew racism or ill-meaning foul language (cursing about football is just fine) or anything of that ilk, your comments ain't gonna last long, jerk.