0 Comments

Audibles From the Long Snapper

| February 23rd, 2012

First Round Draft Party – Thursday April 26

I will be in Chicago for the first round of the NFL Draft in April. At that party, we shall:

  • We’ll give away a pair of Chicago Bears tickets for a game in 2012. By that point I’ll have selected which game (it will be the game I also attend next season and you’ll be seated with me). The seats will be good. Very good.
  • I’ll be courting some sponsors to give away a few other cool prizes for some sillier contests.
  • Most of my updates regarding the party and the contest will come on Twitter. You can follow DaBearsBlog on Twitter by CLICKING HERE.
  • You have to attend the party to qualify for the ticket giveaway.

Backup Quarterback to Be Bears Priority
Lovie Smith made it clear with his statements at the Combine that the Bears will be targeting a backup quarterback in the coming weeks. From the Trib story:

“First off, each year you learn something,” Smith said. “We thought we had a better plan at the quarterback position. I knew how valuable Jay was to us and that won’t change, but we do need to get ourselves in a better position at that backup quarterback position.

“So you start from that. There are a lot of options out there. I think this is an attractive place for a quarterback and we’re going to look at people. I’m talking Caleb (Hanie), Josh (McCown) and of course free-agent quarterbacks out there. I just feel like we’ll be able to strengthen that position more than we were this past year.”

Here’s how I’d rank the available quarterbacks to fill this positions: (1) Kyle Orton (2) Rex Grossman (3) Chad Henne (4) Jason Campbell. All four of those guys would provide the Bears a capable, winning player behind Jay Cutler.

Chargers Considering Franchise Tag for Vincent Jackson?

Until today I hadn’t heard many speculate that VJax was returning to San Diego. Jason La Canfora changed all that with one Tweet. CLICK HERE to read his entire blog post. Here is the start of the piece:

When it’s all said and done, and the franchise-tag deadline arrives March 5, I can’t help but think that wide receiver Vincent Jackson isn’t leaving the Chargers.

Chargers head coach Norv Turner told me the team is considering all of its options with regard to Jackson, who is scheduled to become a free agent.

People close to Jackson tell me they’re convinced that he will ultimately be franchised, despite reports that the team won’t apply the tag. It would cost around $14 million for the Chargers to use the tag for a second straight year on the receiver.

This is disappointing, to say the least. Jackson was set to be the most talented wide receiver on the open market and would have been a surefire Bears target.

0 Comments

Brad Biggs Breaks Down the Bears Salary Cap Situation

| February 21st, 2012

Biggs is the best Bears writer of this generation and he does the leg work on the Bears cap many of you have been asking for. There is little commentary warranted or needed except to say the Bears are in a wonderful financial situation heading into the 2012 offseason. They can have exactly what they want. But will they seize it?

Here is the text of Biggs’ piece. To read his position-by-position breakdown, CLICK HERE.

The NFL shopping season begins three weeks from Tuesday when free agency opens on March 13.

The Chicago Bears will have the room to be as aggressive as they want in the marketplace but it remains to be seen how new general manager Phil Emery wants to handle business in what will be the first defining moves of his tenure.

Emery said at his introductory press conference that his vision is to build through the draft, not surprising considering his background as a college scouting director and area scout. That was long the approach of his predecessor Jerry Angelo before a string of bad drafts caught up to the organization and he was forced to fill many holes via free agency and other avenues.

The Bears, coming off an 8-8 season, are in a situation where they need to win now to enhance the future of coach Lovie Smith, who is signed through 2013. Team president Ted Phillips spoke about closing the talent gap between the Bears and division foes Green Bay and Detroit and free agency is the first vehicle that can be used to achieve that goal.

The Bears project to have more than $20 million in salary cap room. But by rolling over unused salary cap from 2011, the club can push that figure north of $25 million, far and away the most of any team in the division. One league source speculated it could be as much as $28 million. The exact figure is constantly in flux and remember room needs to be carved out for draft picks. The Bears are far from the reported $67 million in cap space the Tampa Bay Buccaneers have but as one general manager said last season it’s no longer the cap that defines the NFL but cash. It comes down to what teams want to budget for their players.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at what the Bears have right now in the way of salary cap figures for individual players for the coming season.

Here are the team’s top five cap figures for 2012, according to documents acquired by the Tribune:

1. DE Julius Peppers $12,183,333

2. LB Brian Urlacher $9,700,000

3. QB Jay Cutler $9,600,000

4. CB Charles Tillman $7,966,670

5. LB Lance Briggs $5,996,666

There are some notes to consider when looking at the Bears’ cap:

*For starters, Tillman’s number is so large because it includes $3 million is in the form of a special teams incentive he will not receive. It’s considered a likely to be earned incentive which counts toward the 2012 cap, but would provide a cap credit for 2013. It fluffs the real value of the deal for an agent and builds in cap credits for the club. If the Bears really wanted to free even more space, they could remove the credit with a renegotiated deal.

*It’s not surprising that four of the top five players are on defense. That is where the Bears have typically invested most. The team has $15,696,666 committed to Pro Bowl linebackers Brian Urlacher and Lance Briggs. That projects to be almost 13.1 percent of the non-adjusted cap for 2012, which is expected to come in around $120 million.

*The Bears are not carrying a lot of dead cap space. Tight end Brandon Manumaleuna, running back Chester Taylor and wide receiver Sam Hurd combine to count $3.1 million vs. the 2012 cap, really a small amount in the big picture.

*The bottom line is Emery is inherited an advantageous position from a cap standpoint. It’s the cap equivalent of a clean slate and he can do with it as he wants.

Nice work, Brad.

0 Comments

We All Need To Stop Talking About Forte and the Franchise Tag

| February 18th, 2012

Franchise tag season begins Monday. Make sure you get all your shopping done this weekend!

The Bears will have until March 5 to either (1) use the tag on running back Matt Forte, (2) sign the double deuce to a long term contract extension or (3) allow him to dip his toes in the calm, cool waters of free agency. Assuming the latter is a non-option (and I do), the Bears have only a few weeks to decide how much of their 2012/future salary cap to tie up in the league’s most fragile position.

Many fans have been clamoring for the Bears to lock Forte up long term for the entire season. They have been joined in their somewhat tired refrain by the talking heads at the four-letters who constantly take the side of players because apparently every single retired NFL player is immediately offered work in Bristol. For those of you who haven’t spent a half hour with Tim Hasselbeck and Damien Woody as they debate Peyton Manning’s future I am truly envious. (I don’t know who is making the football decisions at ESPN but they apparently also believe Jon Gruden is a star analyst so I give up.) The overall sentiment has been overwhelmingly pro-Forte.

But does it matter? Does any of it matter? When you take a close look at the idiotic contract the Panthers gave DeAngelo Williams or the top-heavy deal the Titans gave Chris Johnson, it becomes apparent once again that NFL franchises have their players over the pool table and they are holding the cue stick at an intimidating angle. The length of the contract (years) and salary breakdowns (per) are meaningless. All that matters to the franchise is that they give themselves as many outs over the duration of the contract as possible and Cliff Stein – Bears negotiator extraordinaire – is not know for hamstringing the team with bad contracts. What players want is guaranteed money and Matt Forte will surely seek to equal the $22 million the Panthers guaranteed Williams while falling short of the $30 million the Titans gave Johnson.

What does that mean? It means we’re not actually discussing what fans think we’re discussing. The “should we pay Forte” debate has nothing to do with how long the running back’s tenure will be with the franchise; the only thing fans should care about. The debate has everything to do with how rich should we make Forte currently in order to satisfy him both emotionally and physically as the coming season approaches. The Bears could give Forte a five-year deal tomorrow with a boat load of guaranteed cash and still cut him before the first day of the 2014 league year. Or they could franchise tag him in 2012 and 2013, guaranteeing him about $20 million, and avoid having to cut him awkwardly in on Valentine’s Day in a few years.

This is an economic matter. Not a football matter. And it is not receiving the same traction in the Houston and Baltimore markets, where their elite tailbacks (Arian Foster and Ray Rice) are currently in the exact same situation as Forte. (One could make a solid argument that were all three to hit the open market together, Forte would be the third most targeted.) The reason those stories are not stories is simple: those backs did not make it a story. If Matt Forte did not open his mouth every chance he got to complain about his deal, fans and media alike would not have made the tale their personal Passion play.

Here’s the fact, as I see it. Matt Forte will be the starting tail back for the Chicago Bears in 2012. And most likely he’ll be the starting tail back for the 2013 Chicago Bears. Beyond that he’ll be a 28 year-old running back on the downside of his career and we may be in an NFL that outlaws rushing plays anyway.

0 Comments

How I Might Approach this Chicago Bears Offseason

| February 13th, 2012

As things are beginning to shake out around the NFL and teams are the free agency period is approaching with rapidity, it is time for me to start guessing. That’s all this time of year is for football writers, after all. None of us know which team is going to cut which player. None of us know which prospect has become the apple of which team’s eye. And then there’s the bloody franchise tag making the whole system even more unpredictable. So here are four guesses, mixed with criticisms, opinions and erroneous conjecture.

  • Tackling the wide receiver is a tricky proposition but it is actually rather easy this offseason. If Phil Emery can’t orchestrate the near-impossible trade for Brandon Marshall, there are four WRs on the market with 80-100 catch potential: Vincent Jackson, Dwayne Bowe, Marques Colston and Stevie Johnson. Jackson possesses the combination of speed and size Cutler covets on the outside and he’s spent his career playing with an enigmatic quarterback in a dynamic offense. The Bears could then use their first round draft pick to take either Kendall Wright from Baylor or Michael Floyd of Notre Dame (both projected to be available) and find themselves with an entirely rebuilt receiving corps heading into 2012.
  • I think it’s time for the Bears to put more value on the cornerback position. For years we’ve heard that corner in the Lovie system is valued less than around the rest of the league because it is far more reliant on sound tackling and discipline than on excellent cover skills. But the league has changed and teams are now moving to almost exclusive passing attacks. With what might be the deepest FA cornerback field in a generation, I’d like to see Emery add some physicality on the outside. Cortland Finegan would do that. So would Brent Grimes if he becomes available. Brandon Carr, Carlos Rogers and the Terrell Thomas (coming off a bad injury in 2011 for the Giants) would all be improvements to the Bears secondary.
  • The more days goes by the less likely I believe the Bears will be interested in a premier defensive end on the FA market. Those guys cost a boatload of money and defensive end is fourth or fifth on the Bears’ needs chart. Mario Williams will require not only a lot of years but a lot of money. It will be interesting to see if the Bears become players for Robert Mathis or Osi Umenyiora – two elite, pass rushing veterans who might require a less-lengthy commitment.
  • Let’s not forget backup quarterback. Right now Peyton Manning is clouding the issue. When he lands somewhere the dominoes will begin to fall. But it seems two players will be available next month: Kyle Orton and Jason Campbell. Both would provide the Bears with experience and poise behind Jay Cutler. Both would have led the 2011 Bears to the postseason after Cutty broke his thumb.

You’ll notice I’ve left the offensive line out of the mix. Why? Because I believe Mike Tice will convince Phil Emery he can win with Webb, Williams, Garza, Spencer, Louis and Carimi. And I believe those will be the guys playing offensive line for the Bears this year.

0 Comments

Which Bears Are Untouchable?

| February 9th, 2012

We’ve spent enough time documenting the complicated off-season currently facing new Bears GM Phil Emery. Emery has to do the following before the start of the 2012 season:

  • Find those few players (WR, OL, DE) to elevate the Bears, 7-3 with a healthy QB, to a legitimate Super Bowl contender. (Although I’m not sure they were not already a legitimate contender.)
  • Rebuild roster depth that has been lacking due to several years of mediocre (or below) drafting.

Emery’s first job, however, is analyzing the players currently on the Bears roster. Which of those men is currently untouchable? Because the word untouchable might have varying degrees of meaning, I’ll rephrase it this way: Which players on the Bears roster would you not include in a trade for Brandon Marshall?

The Untouchable: Jay Cutler. Cutty is the going to be the Bears franchise quarterback for the next five-plus years and the club realized in 2010 just how far he can carry them without a single great player on his offensive line or in his receiving corps. He’s the real deal and he can bring this city a championship.

The Aging Superstar: Julius Peppers. If the Bears were to trade Peppers they would see their defense decline more rapidly than they care to imagine. Peppers may not have the sack numbers of the other premiere defensive ends in the game but his versatility and play against the run continue to make him one of the elite defenders in the game. He’s got three solid years left.

The System Man: Brian Urlacher. Urlacher is the prototypical middle linebacker for the Lovie Smith system and dealing him now would be to castrate the head coach before he’s able to jump into bed. If Lovie were no longer the head coach and Marshall could be acquired for Urlacher I would consider the deal awfully hard to pass up.

The Spinal Cord: Matt Forte. I have never been as high on Forte as most, thinking he lacks the breakaway speed and explosiveness needed to be a top tier back in the current NFL. But having watched Marion Barber moron a game away and Kahlil Bell fumble half his touches I am coming to terms with the fact that without the Forte as this offensive organism’s spinal cord, the organism cannot stand. I expect Forte to be signed to a long-term deal in the not so distant future.

The Great Debate: Lance Briggs. Will the regime change lead to a softening of the Lance Briggs’ heart or will one of the best linebackers in the game continue to bicker and moan each summer that he’s underpaid? Will Phil Emery believe his talents outweigh the PR negativity? If Briggs could be dealt in the coming months for Marshall, how would you feel? I admit I’ m torn on the question but I’m leaning towards the Bears needing Marshall more than Briggs. Especially as playing great run defense becomes a secondary need in the modern NFL.

The Up-and-Coming Star: Henry Melton. Melton had 7.5 sacks in 2011, tied for the NFL’s lead among defensive tackles. In the post-Tommie Harris era the Bears have eagerly sought a Sapp-like talent to disrupt the middle of opposing offensive lines and pressure the pocket. Melton has emerged to fill that role in only his second season. Will he take the step to elite player in his third year? Would you be willing to risk his future should a team ask for him in return for a big-time receiver?

0 Comments

Bears Hire Jeremy Bates to Coach the Quarterback

| February 7th, 2012

The Bears exhausted as many options as they could in and around the NFL but ended up “settling” for the right man to coach their quarterback and coordinate their passing game: Jeremy Bates.

For those that will point to Bates’ tenure as offensive coordinator in Seattle as a negative I say the following: who cares? Bates will not be coordinating the Bears offense. He will not be charged with installing an offensive game plan each week or with orchestrating halftime adjustments in the locker room. His job will be simply to tailor to the passing game to the strengths of his friend and former pupil Jay Cutler. His job will be ever more simply to make Jay Cutler happy.

This was the smart move.  For those in the media who once again wrongly wrote that Cutler and Bates were not as close as reported, time to check your sources. For those who yelped about Tice and Bates not being able to co-exist, time to check your information. Cutler has his man and the quarterback has taken another power step with the Chicago Bears franchise.

0 Comments

Rosenbloom Sucks: Leaving All the Chicago Sports Columnists Behind in 2012

| February 6th, 2012

I was sitting on a bench in front of a coffee shop in the beautiful beach town of Spring Lake, New Jersey, waiting for the NJ Transit Coast Line train back to Manhattan last summer. A slick-haired douche pulled up in some way-too-big car and, after getting his coffee inside, started chatting me up as if my wearing jeans in the summertime was a means to conceal a .45 in the waistband. He asked where I was from and I answered politely, “Kearny.”

He seemed impressed. “Tough town,” he responded. That sort of sums up where I come from. A tough town sorta halfway between Newark and Jersey City. That is where I became a Bears fan between the ages of 3 and 4. In the shadow of New York City, and with the Meadowlands visible out my bedroom window, I chose the Chicago Bears because they made a music video. A video I make my friends watch every Super Bowl Sunday for a song whose record I have framed on my bookshelf. If I hadn’t made that choice I would currently be celebrating the fourth Super Bowl title of my lifetime with the New York Giants. But I made that choice and have not regretted for one minute since. It has not only given me my purest sports passion but it has also given me my second geographical home: the great city of Chicago.

Following the Bears in New Jersey in the pre-internet, pre-Sunday Ticket era was an occupation. The Jersey Sports Cafe in Rutherford had a few of those big satellites on the roof and they had a small contingent of Bears fans there each Sunday (including a buddy’s Dad) but convincing my own father to take his eight year-old son to a bar on Sunday proved futile week-in and week-out.

I followed the Bears in three ways when they were not on national television. (1) Since my family had Jets season tickets, I would often attend the games in my Jim McMahon or Tom Waddle jersey and watch the Bears scores update on the big board. Other folks in Section 324 enjoyed it so much it became the Soldier Field Annex. (2) I would be in the living room while my Dad watched the Giants or my brother watched the Jets and once I heard the little jingle that announced scores would scroll at the bottom of the screen I would jump to my feet. Bears 14, Niner 10. Yes! (3) I would sit eagerly in anticipation of ESPN’s Primetime, the greatest show ever produced by the four letters.

I knew nothing of Chicago’s media. Knew nothing of their newspapermen or radio hosts. Knew nothing of the approach those fellas took to the team I loved. I knew only the approach the local media took to the Giants and Jets. My formative sport fan years were spent in the company of the nation’s best sportswriting/broadcasting talents.

Mike & the Mad Dog, WFAN’s industry-changing pair, became part of our lives. When you played Wiffle ball in the driveway or street football there was a always a radio nearby playing Francesa and Russo. Opinions were shaped by Mike and Dog. Debates were formed and furthered by them too. You didn’t have to agree with their often insane opinions to understand they had shaped the language you used to discuss sports. The Newark Star-Ledger had Jerry Izenberg – one of the greatest sportswriters who ever lived. Izenberg could make a failed Vince Coleman bunt attempt read with the power of a Shakespearean tragedy. Dave Anderson in the New York Times was, like Izenberg, one of those sportswriters who seemed to come from a different time. Every one of his columns was delivered with a literary gravitas but one always got the sense he wished he were ringside at the Garden in 1962. The Daily News‘ Mike Lupica could see beyond the game. The player’s face as he stood beside his locker. The Yankee Stadium janitor hiding tears underneath his worn ball cap. These guys were and are the best in the world. And they were all available for a less than a buck up at the corner deli.

Then DirecTV and the Sunday Ticket emerged in the mid-90s and were a sure thing in taverns everywhere by 2000. The internet came too and came hard, making available the full content of the Tribune and Sun-Times. It did not take long for me to realize the men writing columns for those newspapers were not watching the same games I was watching. It did not take long for me to realize there was a pervading sense of negativity in the newspaper each day. Every move was wrong, even when it worked. Every loss was symptomatic of organizational disarray and had nothing to do with missed field goals or dropped touchdown passes. Every win was lucky. Bill Gleason was being replaced on the importance scale by the likes of Jay Mariotti and Rick Telander. These were not men concerned with capturing a sporting event from a unique perspective or with any semblance of passion. These were men concerned with instigating a disappointed populous by praying upon a seemingly inborn negativity.

There are still bad columnists working in Chicago, of course. David Haugh’s opinions are as bland and lifeless as his prose. Rick Morrissey actually graces the pages of the Sun-Times with these kinds of sentences (about Phil Emery), “If somebody had asked him about the life of a hermit, he would have said it takes a village to raise a recluse.” Deadspin went out of their way to attack Telander’s work of Herculean inanityon Cutler’s non-winning sensibility with the brilliant headline, “Jay Cutler Is Not a Winner Because He Doesn’t Smile at Bears Employees, Writes Crazy Person.”

Steve Rosenbloom is the worst. In my two decades of reading sports writers from around the country I have never encountered a man quite like him. His writing is atrocious; a mixture of failed humor attempts and sarcastic jabs at the local teams. His opinions are pointless and predictable. His moment-to-moment reactions to Bears games on his blog actually reveal how little he understands the game he’s covering. Rosenbloom is not competing with the best sports columnists in the country. Rosenbloom is competing with the drunkest guy at the end of the bar and the loudest teenage brat on Twitter.

Today is the first day of the 2012 NFL season. And DaBearsBlog will no longer validate the existence of these men on its pages. Brad Biggs, Sean Jensen and the boys over at ESPN Chicago are the real deal. We’ll celebrate their work and rely on their information. But no longer will I be using the columnists as a springboard for my columns. No longer will links to Rosenbloom or Haugh or Telander appear here. The Chicago Bears are one of the greatest franchises in the history of sports and the Chicago Bears fan deserves better.

Can I be the one to provide it? I hope, from an opinion perspective, I am part of a solution . I know, from an editorial perspective, ignoring the current crop of columnists is a definitive step in the right direction for the emotional and intellectual sanity of us all.

0 Comments

Super Bowl Game Prediction & Fantasy Playoffs Finale

| February 2nd, 2012

GAME PREDICTION

I’ve noticed a great many of our readers on the blog have no interest in this Super Bowl and that seems odd to me. We’d all prefer the Bears be in every Super Bowl but they’re not. Still, the Packers are not in this Super Bowl either – even after a 15-1 season. The Lions are not in this Super Bowl. They were blown out in New Orleans. There is nothing particularly annoying or emotionally devastating about this game. On the contrary I can’t remember a Super Bowl with more story lines and more drama. I’m looking forward to the game.

And I like the Pats.

Yes I know the Patriots are going to have a hellish time defending the Giants passing attack. There’s nobody in their secondary capable of staying with Nicks, Cruz and Manningham. There’s also not enough talent in the Pats pass rush to disrupt Eli Manning’s pocket. Give Eli time and he’ll dice you up. This game could easily end 38-10 Giants.

But I’m going with intangibles. Belichick and Brady do not want to lose consecutive Super Bowls. Do not want to see their SB record drift closer to.500. Do not want to finish their respective tenures with the mark of not having been able to beat Coughlin and Eli. I’m taking one of the greatest coach/quarterback tandems in history on Sunday.

Patriots 30, Giants 28

THE LOU MALNATI’S PIZZA CONTEST

  • Seven of us remain in the Fantasy Playoffs pizza contest.
  • I am left with the Patriots offense, Giants defense and Patriots special teams. This essentially means that my offense and defense will nullify each other and I’ll be entirely reliant on the Pats specials.
  • The tiebreakers are the following: (1) The combined quarterback rating of both Tom Brady and Eli Manning. This is Price is Right rules. You cannot go over. (2) The total number of Giants rushing yards. Price is Right rules.  (3) Total number of catches by members of the Patriots not named Gronkowski, Hernandez and Welker. Price is Right.
  • My tiebreakers: 179.2, 63, 4

Contestants List

Jeff “Blogfather” Hughes

SidLuckman42

SC Dave

JimWoww

TheFifth

BigT

TheVoid

0 Comments

Seven Super Bowl Questions: Volume Two

| February 1st, 2012

We continue with my top four questions heading into Super Bowl Sunday.

#4 What will Tom Brady’s approach to the Giant d-line be?

In 2007 and earlier this year Tom Brady was under duress from the fearsome Giants pass rush and one of the most prolific passing attacks in the game was relegated to the land of the ordinary. But this passing attack is a bit different for Brady. He relies on timing routes to his tight ends and slot man Wes Welker. I can’t imagine the Pats will pull a Mike Martz and drop Brady deep in the pocket repeatedly, subjecting him to the likes of Pierre-Paul, Tuck and Osi. Brady will have to hit the quick stuff outside and over the middle. He’ll have to go to the run from shotgun to keep the edge rushers honest. It is the only way he’ll be successful.

#3 Is Gronk healthy and can the Pats survive without his at %100?

If Rob Gronkowski can’t play Sunday I see no way for the Patriots to win this game. Aaron Hernandez is good but he’s far more wide receiver than tight end. Gronk positions himself at the end of the line, delivers punishment to rushers and then revolutionizes the tight end position by catching every ball thrown his way, being borderline impossible to tackle and scoring touchdowns at a clip we’ve never seen in the NFL previously. He is THE mismatch. Not only against the Giants but against the entire league. Without him the Pats will not be able to play the game that ushered them to a 13-3 year and may be looking at long evening in Indianapolis.

#2 How in God’s name can the Pats cover the Giants wide receivers?

They can’t. For two reasons: (1) the Giants wide receivers are as good as there are in football and (2) the Pats secondary is crappy. I talked yesterday about the Pats living in the “big nickel” look, attempting to use quantity to compensate for their lacking in quality. But the truth is they’ll be forced to engage in a shootout unless Vince Wilfork and the great Mark Anderson can harass Eli Manning the way the brilliant Niners front seven did a few back in San Francisco. Without that pressure it could be a field day for Nicks, Cruz and Manningham. (Side note: I do wonder if Shaun Ellis will have something for this game.)

#1 What does this game REALLY mean to Belichick and Brady?

I usually don’t get concerned with intangibles when it comes to the Super Bowl because rarely do they have any influence on the outcome of the contest. But Bill Belichick is one of the greatest football coaches that has ever lived. Tom Brady is one of the greatest quarterbacks that has ever lived. And four years ago they were on the precipice of a perfect season. If they beat the Giants that night in Arizona, they’d each have that elusive fourth Super Bowl and solid arguments could be made that each belong historically at the very top their craft. They did not win that game. And earlier this season they lost to Coughlin and Eli once again.

This game has to mean more to them than any other they’ve played together. It has to. If they win they’ll have their redemption, four years later, with an inferior roster. If they win it they’ll each have that fourth Super Bowl and their immortality. If they lose their legacy will be marred by their inability to beat Coughlin and Eli. Their brilliant run together over this past decade will be marked with an impressive (but not legendary) 3-2 record in the biggest game of all. For mortals that record would be more than sufficient. For Belichick and Brady it can’t be.

NOTE: PREDICTION FOR THE GAME IS COMING TOMORROW AS WE’LL ALSO START ACCEPTING CONTEST ENTRIES FOR THE FINAL ROUND OF THE PIZZA CONTEST.