0 Comments

Three Must Happens in 2010

| June 6th, 2010

I was asked in a bar the other night what I believed the Bears needed to do to make the postseason.  I quickly rambled off a list of eight or nine things and spent the following morning attempting to put that drunken incoherence into a tangible column for you, my blog buddies. 

First, there is one rule.  Everything on the list needs to be a plausible improvement over something done last year.  (Arguing that Tommie Harris needs 12 sacks or Jay Cutler needs to go sixteen interception-less weeks are simply not going to get it done.)  That being said, here’s my three.  Add yours below…

#1 Jay Cutler needs to reduce his interceptions by half.  What would you think of Cutler’s 2009 season if it read 60.5%, 3,666 yards, 27-13 (as opposed to 27-26).  You know what you’d think?  It’s the greatest single season performance at the position in the history of the organization.  Cutler needs to take his shots down the field but he simply needs to be more willing to toss the ball to the sideline when the offensive line forces him into uncomfortable situations.  Robbie Gould three-pointers have been sustaining the club for years.  They’ll continue to do so.

#2 Reduce Opposing Rushing Percentage.  I was actually surprised when studying the Bears’ defensive stats of a year ago.  They’re bad but the league actually had much worse.  However, the Bears were tenth worst against the run and thirteenth worst against the pass.  You can do one of them poorly but if you do both poorly, you’re just poor.  The Bears have been a successful defensive unit when they force opponents to be one-dimensional and the healthy trio of Urlacher, Briggs and Tinoisamoa must be charged with forcing opponents to throw, throw, throw.  What’s this mean?  Take the 126.4 yards per game down to 106.4.

#3 Bears Must Develop a Deep Threat.  With the speed of Hester and Knox at wide receiver, the mismatches created with Olsen and the arm strength of Cutler, the Bears had no reason to be tied with five teams for 20th in passing plays over 40 yards.  (Seriously?  San Francisco beat us in long passing plays?)  If the Bears can make teams respect their ability to go deep down the field, the offense might finally be able to reach its potential.  This is why Mike Martz was hired.  6 passing plays of 40+ needs to hit double-digits.  

0 Comments

Audibles From the Long Snapper

| May 24th, 2010

So a minicamp is in the book and now comes the long peaceful wait for training camp.

Lovie Smith is Swallowing the Happy Pills

“I’m excited,” Smith said. “There’s nothing to not like about what we did. Getting Brian (Urlacher) back at his position and seeing Brian and Lance (Briggs) back together, and Pisa Tinoisamoa also coming back. Then seeing Chris Harris back on the field and hearing his voice, along with seeing Julius Peppers. I see Tommie Harris in the best health he’s been in. Mark Anderson … seeing Zack Bowman continuing to make progress … it kind of goes on and on. We like what we saw out there.”

Who else is booking their hotel rooms for Dallas in February?  It’s nice to see Lovie Smith excited about the defensive outlook for the 2010 season but I’ll temper my enthusiasm for the time being.  Unless Julius Peppers produces at a Pro Bowl level and Chris Harris stays healthy, the Bears will have a difficult time improving arguably the worst defensive unit in franchise history.


Mark Anderson: Defensive Key
Vaughn McClure calls Mark Anderson the likely starter opposite Julius Peppers and how he performs may very well determine the success of the entire unit.  Anderson has been the Lovie love affair I’ve yet to understand and with Alex Brown no longer serving a purpose here (and only finding a home with the measly Super Bowl champions), the pressure will grow weekly on #97.  And there’s one place in particular (read: here) that will closely monitor both his sack totals and his play against the run – Brown’s strongest asset.  

Wanted: Veteran Quarterback
The consistent word out of Halas Hall is that Mike Martz wants a veteran backup quarterback.  The reason?  Simple.  He knows there isn’t a second, viable professional quarterback on the roster and he’s worried about his offensive line’s ability to protect.  (The idea of bringing Trent Green in is intriguing but Green’s brain should be his priority.)  Martz has gone overboard in his praising of the quarterback, backs, tight ends and receivers but he’s not said too much about the fellas responsible for keeping defenders from breaking their bones.  A veteran backup is a good idea.  Marc Bulger is the guy.  

Final Word: I hate to let my theatre self crossover into my football self but methinks the ladies doth protest too much.  When someone keeps telling you how good they are, chances are they aren’t that good.  

0 Comments

In Defense of Brian Urlacher

| May 21st, 2010

First, somehow I knew Brian Urlacher’s criticism of Gale Sayers’ comments would have legs and the national attention being paid is proof of just that.  Second, I am the last person on earth most expect to come to the defense of Urlacher – a player who has worn out his welcome with me since the Super Bowl campaign of 2006.  But, you know, I’m doing just that.

The Bears of yesteryear need to shut their mouths.  Ditka.  Butkus.  Sayers.  Hampton.  All of them.  Collectively they need to find something better to do with their time.  I understand the rationale, believe me.  Mike Ditka is nobody when detached from his success with the Bears.  Sayers and Butkus know that if people aren’t asking them about what’s happening on Lake Shore Drive then people aren’t asking them anything at all.  These are men whose identities are undeniably attached to the Chicago Bears organization.  It’s not the notion of them commenting that bothers me.   It’s how they comment.
Look at this dose of idiocy from Hampton:

“Ultimately, [the Bears] haven’t been successful in three years. However you want to cut it, those are the facts. Gale Sayers just had the audacity to point it out.”

The audacity to point out the team hasn’t made the playoffs in three years?  Who hasn’t pointed that out?  It doesn’t take audacity to state facts, does it?  Are we going to applaud men for stating what any child could read off the Bears Wikipedia page?
What pissed Urlacher off?  It’s simple.  A man who had ZERO team success in his albeit short playing career (ironically cut off by injury) wondering publicly if 54 was too old to rebound from injury.  Urlacher broke his wrist.  He didn’t tear up his knee or struggle to get out of bed one morning.  Why shouldn’t he go to bat for himself and the organization?  Why shouldn’t he make it clear that just because you played well in a Bears uniform once doesn’t give you the ever-ending critical pulpit?  Nobody is happy with how the last three years have progressed for the Chicago Bears but that shouldn’t mean the Bears of yesteryear have an open-ended ticket to bash the only reason anybody knows their names.
And let me add this.  Where the hell was Sayers in 2006?  Butkus?  I don’t remember turning on the television in the two weeks leading up to the Super Bowl and seeing these guys praising the club for their wonderful run to a title game, do you?  You don’t.  You know why?  Because that’s not how these guys work.  And I’m glad someone finally had the nerve to call them out on it.  If you’re looking for real audacity, Brian Urlacher showed that.  And he may have won me back as a fan. 

0 Comments

Welcome Back, Brian

| May 20th, 2010

I’ve thought something had gone fishing from Brian Urlacher’s game since his early, dominant days at middle linebacker.  The days when his being called overrated were just the jealous exclamations of a league that hadn’t seen a combination of his athletic ability and skin color.  Since those days his game has taken a dip, mostly due to injury, and he’s allowed himself to be the punching bag of media, fans and everybody who thinks that it’s Butkus or bust at the position in Chicago.

Last night, Brian Urlacher got angry.  And he responded to the critical comments Gale Sayers made weeks ago.

“Let me ask you a question: ‘How many championships did Gale Sayers win?”’ Urlacher told the Tribune. “How many playoff games did he win when he played? None. None. None.
“Does it bother me? There are enough people throwing daggers at us right now, why does one of our ex-players have to jump in? There are enough experts talking (crap) about us, so why does a Bear, an all-time great, have to jump in? I just don’t like that.”
“… Does (Sayers) know how to win football games? Does he? No. How are you going to criticize someone else when you haven’t done it yourself? He’s one of our own, so that’s why it’s so frustrating.”

There are some who’ll argue these are just words.  And maybe that’s true.  But they are words from an unlikely source.  Urlacher has never been the vocal leader of this organization, leaving those duties to Mike Brown, Thomas Jones and Olin Kreutz through the years.  Maybe his time has come.


Because Brian knows his legacy can be cemented in Chicago as one of the all-time greats by achieving one goal and one goal only: a title.  I wonder if this wasn’t a warning shot.

0 Comments

If I Were Living in Chicago…

| May 19th, 2010

There’s no way I wouldn’t be attending this.  If any of you decide to go, please send me reports.

‘Da Bears Movie Dat Wasn’t,’ Wendt, Mantegna and Ditka added to da’ Just For Laughs

by Chris Jones

Coming ‘atcha, once again from the heart of Chicago, the Super Fans. It’s been a bit of a dry spell, (da’ Bears!) and a certain team from a certain city (da’ Bears!) has failed to run roughshod over the competition, but listen up. The Super Fans are back for a live performance as part of this summer’s Just For Laughs festival.

“Da Bears Movie Dat Wasn’t” will be a live reading of a never-produced screenplay, to star George Wendt, Joe Mantegna, Robert Smigel, Bob Odenkirk, Richard Roeper (as a narrator) and Mike Ditka (as Himself).

DitkaThe story: Da’ Bears have been sold, and the beloved Soldier Field is to be converted into all luxury boxes for the rich. And here’s the thing: This really was a screenplay, written back in the mid-1990s by Smigel and Odenkirk for Paramount based on characters from the “Saturday Night Live” sketch, said Smigel after the announcement Tuesday. It never got made. Tickets for the one-night-only reading June 19 at the Park West go on sale 10 a.m. Saturday at www.ticketmaster.com.

“It’s an expansion of the world of the Super Fans,” Smigel said. “We get to meet their families, their kids, their wives, go to church with them.”

Smigel said he got the original inspiration for the Super Fans characters from coming to Chicago as a New Yorker in the ’80s. He took himself to a Cubs game and noticed all the things that were better about seeing a game at Wrigley versus in New York, he said. “For one thing, I looked out at the bleachers and saw all the people in the quote-unquote ‘crappy’ seats having the best time.”

From there, it was just spending time in sports bars soaking up the atmosphere. “I saw a lot of guys in loud T-shirts wearing the aviator shades, sporting the walrus mustache modeled after Ditka — which I believe came to be an emblem of virility at the time.”

The show will also include Super Fan sketches and a Q&A session with Ditka; it’s billed as a benefit for the organizations Have Dreams: Helping Autistic Voices Emerge and the Gridiron Greats Assistance Fund.

0 Comments

The Brian Cushing Precedent

| May 12th, 2010

Peter King supports the AP’s decision to re-vote on the Defensive ROY Award given to Brian Cushing for his 2009 performance.  (For those who don’t know, Cushing tested positive for the same hCG Manny Ramirez missed fifty games last year for.)  He doesn’t give too many ideological reasons outside of his clear disdain for the use of PEDs in sports and his lack of concern for setting a difficult precedent.  That precedent, says King’s colleague Don Banks, is not worth ignoring:

It may not always be a nice, neat, easy call, and that’s why you don’t toss out the principle of precedent every time you feel the whim. It may not be the case of the moment that requires much foresight, but the case that we don’t yet know about, and is still unimagined, just might.

The truth?  It’s somewhere in the middle.


One must be very clear about what is actually happening here.  The media, the football writers of America, are deciding that a player’s performance on the field is not worth an accolade due to evidence of a performance enhancing drug.  In that regard there is no precedent being set here as the baseball writers have been keeping Mark McGwire’s Hall of Fame credentials out of the Hall for a few years now.  This is not a league-given award.  The league is making no comment on the action outside the required four-game suspension.

Where is there a precedent?  The football writers are retroactively making mid-career decision that can significantly hamper a player’s ability to achieve particular incentives in their contracts.  PFT touches on this fact:

Meanwhile, Brandt reports that Cushing’s contract included a trigger based on winning the AP defensive rookie of the year award, resulting in a $2.219 million bonus.  But Cushing met other alternative triggers, which means that he’ll keep the money even if he doesn’t secure the honor based on do-over voting that closes at 12:00 p.m. E.T. on Wednesday.  

That was Cushing.  It won’t be the next guy.  If the writers vote to remove this award from Cushing, you better believe that agents will remove every AP-based performance award from future contract negotiations and subsequently devalue the worth of the prize.  It’s a step I’m glad the AP is willing to take but also a bold gesture that will open the door for other organizations to “boxing up” the MVP and Defensive Player of the Year awards.  (“Boxing up” is a phrase I just invented to mean the handing out of multiple awards, subsequently devaluing all of them.)  Those are awards are significant sources of pride for players, teams and fans.


And by making this move retroactively, the AP begins dancing to music they’ll soon find it very difficult to maintain in-step with.  What if Cushing is the best defensive player of the year in 2010?  Will the writers assume he is not on the drugs?  If they assume that, can’t they assume he would have been the same player without the drugs in 2009?   

My overwhelming feeling has been to look the other way on the use of performance enhancers in football.  None of us can imagine the wear and tear that the human body experiences over the course of a sixty-minute gridiron battle and if these guys need a couple hormones to be able to wake up on Monday morning, fine.  The stats in football don’t matter, no matter what the fantasy geeks tell you.  And I don’t believe for half-a-second that hCG made Brian Cushing better at rushing the passer or wrapping up Joseph Addai.  Did it make him faster and stronger?  Probably.  But until someone in the sport of football begins to do things that seem impossible, I just can’t hop atop the soap box.

I hope these players know the health implications and aren’t risking long-term medical stability for short-term financial gain.  (Based on the fact that most athletes can’t seem to drive to the grocery store without a blood alcohol level twice the legal limit, I’m doubtful.)  If the league and the Associated Press want to make a serious impact on the lives of these players, how about focusing more attention on protecting the brains of the game’s most prized assets?  

0 Comments

Audibles From the Long Snapper

| May 4th, 2010

Hey folks.  Trying to weigh in on issues when they’re of interest but May and June are essentially the only down months of the NFL season.  

Mike Tice Likes J’Marcus Webb
While it’s unlikely Webb will make much of an impact in 2010, Tice seems to believe Webb has a future as a starting left guard in this league for years to come.  The battle at left guard and safety opposite Chris Harris are the only “real” camp battles this summer in Bourbonnais and it’d be exciting to see a seventh-round rookie throw himself into the mix.
Mike Martz Likes Veteran Quarterbacks
I have repeatedly stated how afraid I am of being one bad turn of the ankle away from Caleb Hanie as starting quarterback of the Chicago Bears and apparently Mike Martz agrees.  Aside from the moronic beliefs of Mike Florio, signing Marc Bulger provides the Bears a backup with an absurdly-developed knowledge of their offensive system.  Continue developing Hanie, of course, but think of what it could mean to have Bulger in 2010.
My Thoughts on the Bears Receivers 
Mike Martz says he loves them.  Peter King says he doesn’t.  The truth?  Somewhere in between.  The Bears have quality players at the position with a wide range of skills.  Devin Aromashodu can be a viable number one guy but needs to showcase that talent over the duration of a sixteen-game season.  Devin Hester’s speed is one of the team’s greatest assets.  Earl Bennett has shown, over time, an ability to make the big catch over the middle.  You also can’t discuss the Bears receivers without discussing the potential for 150 catches from the tight end position.  The Bears don’t possess that elite talent – Marshall, Moss, Steve Smith – that causes opposing defensive coordinators to alter their game plans.  Is it cause for concern?  Possibly.  Should it worry the Chicago Bears?  Not until they get themselves another safety.

0 Comments

Expectation for 2010

| April 30th, 2010

Mini-camps start today.  They don’t mean much.  Nothing gets accomplished outside the bare bones integration of rookies and new players into the established system and reports of how impressed the coaching staff is with Jay Cutler’s arm, Julius Peppers’ speed and Devin Hester’s progress.  (By the way, Hester was great on the phone and he now has a fan for life.)
But today, at least symbolically, marks the start of the 2010 season.  A season that for better or worse will go a long way towards shaping the immediate future of the franchise we hold dear.  What are the possible outcomes?  The utter disaster of six wins or less will lead to an organizational house cleaning as the McCaskey Gang will spend next January auditioning new leadership.  The middle ground of 7-9 wins will sound the Ho Hum Alarm and most likely have the same outcome as 0 wins.  A playoff appearance and first-game loss?  Debate will reign.  A playoff appearance and first-game win?  Contract extensions all around?
We all want to win, whether we like the fellas in charge or not.  But how often do we expect to win?  I expected the 2009 Bears to struggle out of the box offensively but hit something of a stride late and find themselves in the thick of the playoff hunt.  I never expected the rampant defensive meltdowns throughout the year or Jay Cutler’s frenzy of interceptions. It took my appearance in the building on a cold Monday night in December to realize what the offense could be.  (Most casually disregard the defense’s porous effort in allowing Favre and company to move up and down the field at will.)
I expect the 2010 Bears to be good right from the start.  I expect them to register double-digit victories.  I expect them to make a postseason appearance and possibly win a game.  The pressure is everywhere: Angelo, Smith, Martz, Cutler, Peppers, Urlacher…etc.  They’ve all got to perform at their best to climb out of the NFC North’s third position and back into the limelight of the league’s elite.  Nevertheless I expect it.  Expect it in a way I haven’t in some time.  The money’s been spent.  The talent assembled.
The time is now for everybody involved.  With the exception of Cutler, each other name on that shortlist’s future in Chicago is entrenched in the success of the 2010 campaign.  The time is now.  That starts the first week of the season.

0 Comments

Stop Over-Thinking, Sign Sharper

| April 28th, 2010

The Bears trading for Chris Harris yesterday solidified the strong safety position for the 2010 season and and even has Steve “Optimism Ain’t Nothin’ But a Thang” Rosenbloom admitting the “defense is starting to look like a defense”.  The move was both a mea culpa for a deal made in error and an acknowledgement that entering 2010 with the same back line would be tantamount to seasonal suicide.

I ask this.  Why enter the 2010 season with a question mark at free safety when Darren Sharper – still one of the league’s five best at that position – is readily available and making the free agency rounds?  Why not reach back into the clearly-open pockets of the McCaskey Gang and shell out the six million a year it’ll cost to field our best pair of safeties since Mike Brown and Tony Parrish roamed together.
Sharper’s skill set, primarily his ballhawking ability, is perfectly matched to Harris’ step-in-the-gap-and-make-a-big-hit mentality.  And if Julius Peppers generates the type of pass rush he’s being paid to generate, Sharper should have more than a few opportunities to grab hurried throws downfield.
To me, it’s a no-brainer.  Especially for a leadership group living on borrowed time.  The Bears have one glaring hole on defense and the player to fill it is available.  Sign Darren Sharper.