0 Comments

Bears to Play Bucs in London Next Season

| April 12th, 2011

Reports are now being confirmed that the Bears will travel to London in 2011 to play the Bucs in what will be a Bucs home game.  The exact date of the contest will be released with the remainder of the schedule.

Also announced today was the preseason schedule, which will feature the Bears in two high-profile national television slots.  They will face the Rams in the Hall of Fame Game on the evening of August 7 on NBC.  They will then wait fifteen days before facing the Giants at the New Meadowlands, Monday night August 22, on ESPN.

0 Comments

I Used to Love the NFL in April

| April 8th, 2011

This was an actual dialogue between my brother Jon (a die-hard Jets fan) and myself (a Chicago Bears addict):

Jon: I haven’t followed any of this labor stuff.
Me: I haven’t either.
Jon: I just don’t care.
Me: Just let me know when they play the games.
Jon: How was the US vs. Argentina game?
Me: Cold but amazing…
(The conversation then drifted off to soccer for thirty minutes.)

The NFL has a draft to hold in three weeks.  Three weeks.  And if they don’t reach a labor agreement prior to that time, the draft will have none of the excitement or juice of years past.  Without the ability to trade players on draft day, without the build-up of free agency and roster turnover, the draft will simply be a television exercise.  And a television exercise wherein no amount of Mel Kiper Jr. and Todd McShay bitch-fighting will be able to steer the conversation away from labor.  Away from the prospect of there not being OTAs and training camp.  Away from the prospect of there not being an actual football season.  And, really, who the hell wants to sit through that?
Listen, I’m not going to boycott the NFL.  I’m certainly not going to boycott the Chicago Bears.  Even if they returned to action on November 1st there is little chance I’d be able to stay away from the television set.  But normally, at this time of year, I am clamoring for the release of the NFL schedule.  In fact, last year I called the NFL offices several times.  Normally at this time of year I am reading every piece of information I can find about the first four rounds of prospects.  Normally at the time of year I am calculating my finances to see if its possible for me to spend a month of the summer in Bourbonnais.  This year I’m not because right now, I don’t care.
And I am on the top of the NFL fan mountain – the passionate blogger who has cried at victory and broken up with women after defeat.  What is the middling fan going to do should this labor dispute be prolonged?  What is the family man with other things on his plate going to do come September without football?  What is the sports bar owner across the country going to do on Sunday afternoons when the leaves change?  There are so many questions.  I wonder if the NFL has any answers.
But only one question matters to me.  One single question.  Are they playing football?  Because until I know they are, I don’t care about the rest of it.

0 Comments

Open Debate: Second Round Draft Pick

| April 1st, 2011

There will not be much variety when it comes to my analysis of the 2011 Chicago Bears draft.  I am more than on record as saying I believe the team should use each and every pick on an offensive lineman and hope they strike gold a few times.  They have no other pressing position on their roster.  If they solidify their club up front, they can easily win the NFC.

ere are two players I like in the second round.

RODNEY HUDSON G/C FLORIDA STATE

Video of Performance: Click here.  (He’s #62)

Analysis from O-Line World: Click here.

Upside: Hudson is often applauded for his “nasty” and his versatility on the line (he’s believed to be a future center).  He is also a terrific athlete with no history of health problems.

Downside: LeCharles Bentley says, ” Some coaches may believe he can play guard in the NFL based on his ability to anchor.  The reality is he would be a great guard for about a season in the NFL because physically it’s very difficult to be the nail and not the hammer week to week in the NFL.  Every defensive coordinator will instruct their 330lb DT’s to bull rush Rodney every single snap with the intent of breaking him.”

My Take: The Bears need to have an heir apparent for Olin Kreutz in place by the end of the 2011 season as OK can’t have many more season left in the Hawaiian tank.  Hudson can fill the guard slot for a year and shift over for 2012 if he’s able.

But I’d prefer…

 DANNY WATKINS G BAYLOR

Video of Performance: Click here.

Upside: From Beyond the Combine – “Delivers a good initial punch. Physical in the run game, finishes off blocks, plays with a nasty attitude. Drops hips well,  Plays with good pad-level, good feet. An intelligent prospect that understands blocking schemes. Great upper body strength, plays with good posture, very patient. Good balance and body control. Showed at the Senior Bowl that he can anchor against the bull-rush on a consistant basis.”

Downside: From Shutdown Corner – “The former part-time firefighter (he went to Butte because of the school’s Fire Sciences program) will turn 27 years old in November, which may give potential NFL suitors pause as much as his lack of experience — his age could make him a one-contract guy. Doesn’t possess great second-level agility, but may be able to modify his technique over time to fit a zone-combo scheme. Watkins’ natural ability to adopt a new position will be tested by more complex NFL defenses — it wouldn’t be surprising if he struggles at first as his technique catches up to his raw ability.”

My Take: A 27 year-old Canadian with experience as both a firefighter and a hockey player.  Yes, you could say I want this guy on the Chicago Bears.

0 Comments

Open Debate: First Round Draft Pick

| March 28th, 2011

Because there is no free agency period and because the NFLPA and NFL owners are currently entangled in the stupidest labor dispute in American history, there is nothing to write about.  Instead I’ve been spending all my time developing TheOtherSports.com (come check it out) and focusing my attention on non-NFL activites.

Today’s open debate is an easy one.  Who should Jerry Angelo and company select in the first round?  My answer: Mike Pouncey, Florida.

Yes I know that most have Pouncey slotted before the Bears select at 29.  (Prognosticators have him going anywhere from 20-28.)  But Pouncey is the perfect addition to the Bears offensiive line.  He would immediately start at guard and be the natural successor to Olin Kreutz at center as our beloved #57 only has one or two more rodeos left in his hind quarters. 

I also liked the PFT report wherein Pouncey declared he’d attend the draft if invited and regardless of the the NFLPA.  I like someone who doesn’t care what he’s expected to do and I like those kinds of guys in the trenches for the Chicago Bears.

So…who is your pick?

0 Comments

Bears Must Protect Return Game From NFL

| March 21st, 2011

hester-return.jpg
UPDATE: KICKOFFS OFFICIALLY MOVED TO 35.  TOUCHBACKS REMAIN AT 20.  PER NFL.COM.

The NFL Competition Committee, the talented group of brainiacs that meet each offseason and discuss the minutiae of the NFL game experience, are proposing moving kickoffs from the 30 to the 35 yard-line for reasons of player safety I simply don’t understand.  The belief currently circulating is that kickoff returns are responsible for a lack of player safety and not the remaining 97% of action wherein a series of three hundred pound men kick the shit out of each other.

Now comes word that the Bears are planning to vote against this proposal and damn it good for them.  The Bears have designed an offense that depends upon the yardage attained with their league-best return game and have structured their roster salaries accordingly.  To suddenly change rules and allow kickers to easily knock the ball to the back of the end zone would be a severe detriment to this organization – and would brandish harsher results than anywhere else in the league.
Eliminating the kickoff return game would also eliminate one of the most exciting elements of the sport.  Player safety is an important matter to me but the solution to that issue is not attempting to limit the number of times players actually get hit.  That’s foolish and reductive.  The solution is putting the players in situations where they can sustain those hits without damage beneath the pads and if damage is sustained, removing them from the playing surface.  Anybody else find it odd that hockey and baseball players miss months due to concussions and football players often get back on the field within a half hour?
The Bears should take a stand on this.  So should the Browns.  And the Seahawks.  And the Jets.  And any other team with a premier kick return game.  Making the game safer is fine.  Changing the rules to make it less contact-driven is pandering to pressure and avoiding the sport’s real issues.

0 Comments

Lockout Thread

| March 13th, 2011

scrooge-mcduck.jpg

Jerry Jones at home.

Blindly supporting the players or owners in a CBA situation can be a problematic approach, especially during barroom discussions.  If you support the owners, you’re a right-winger who has no compassion for the working man.  If you support the players, you’re a socialist who believes it’s more important for millionaires to make more millions than for a sport to continue operating at a profit.  

Other than player safety and healthy, here’s my stance: I don’t care.  Not for one second.  I don’t care if they go to an 18-game season.  I don’t care if they decrease the salary cap.  I don’t care about “splitting the pie”.  I want football.  So figure out how to make that happen and do it.
I’ll let you guys control the conversation on this issue and join in on occasion.  It’s just hard for a struggling playwright/sports blogger, who spends 8 hours a day wrestling with day-to-day financial solvency, to get emotional about a squabble of millionaires versus billionaires.
In the meantime, Noah and I have launched a new website called TheOtherSports.com.  It is a site dedicated to covering golf, NASCAR, soccer around the world and sports normally ignored by the mainstream press.  Stop by and see if ya like it.  Remember it’s a work in progress and all feedback is appreciated.  We’re also looking for contributors so email me if you’re interested at jeff@dabearsblog.com.

0 Comments

Offensive Line, Offensive Line, Offensive Line…

| March 9th, 2011

There is a belief in the sports world that the NFL season is now 52 weeks long and allows coaches and organizations only the short break between the end of their season and the start of the scouting combine in Indianapolis (the shorter that break, the more successful your season). For the Chicago Bears, I’m hoping these few months don’t allow them too much time, too much distance from the central issues of their 2010 campaign: the offensive line.

Yes they need a big target wide receiver but that is seemingly available in the free agent market and will be a crapshoot on draft days.  Yes they need some depth on the defensive line and in the secondary but depth, while important, can’t be the focus of an imperfect team on the precipice of great things.  Sure they might pursue the services of a veteran quarterback to backup Jay Cutler, though I don’t believe it is anywhere near a priority.  I like Caleb Hanie and believe he should be anointed the backup today.
This team, the 2010 Chicago Bears, has one definitive flaw that must be corrected before they become the 2011 Chicago Bears.  Insanity, as Einstein defined it, is performing the same act repeatedly and expecting different results.  If the Bears rely on Mike Tice’s ability to coach-em-up and this profoundly unfortunate feeling that the line improved over the course of the season, they will be dooming themselves to insanity.  

They do not require development of young talent, though J’Marcus Webb is certainly a player with a future in the organization.  They do not require more time to become acquainted with a complicated system, though improvement will surely follow the continuation of the Mad Mike system.  The Bears need better players on the offensive line.  Plain and simple.  Not a single individual, with the exception of Webb, should be considered irreplaceable over the next six months.  Not one.  Not the aging great in the center.  Not the talented Mexican at guard.  Certainly not the left side – which walked an eighteen-game tight rope and spent too much time on the security net.

They need better players and they need as many as possible.  If they’re going to be a running team they need better blockers up the gut.  If they’re going to pass they need better protection on the outside.  Better.  Now.  Because if they don’t acquire better talent on the offensive line, the Bears will be flaunting their defensive line depth as they watch their division rival hoist a second straight Lombardi Trophy.

0 Comments

More Audibles From the Long Snapper

| March 7th, 2011

Pompei Has Warped Priorities

Dan Pompei wrote a few weeks ago that the Bears were not in need of a wide receiver and now he’s writing that their off-season priority is acquiring of a second defensive end or solid under tackle.  I liked Dan’s work very much in the regular season but what has he been smoking since the Bears lost to the Packers in the NFC Championship Game?   The Bears need blockers.  They need a big play wide receiver.  Every team in football would like to get more pressure on the quarterback but if the Bears are identifying that as their biggest weakness then they are having a difficult time identifying their weaknesses.  
PFT Lists Ten Things to Know About the Labor Dispute
I have been basically ignoring everything regarding the CBA but I took some time and read this thorough piece on PFT this morning.  It’s worth looking at.  The passage I found most interesting was this:
As Texans right tackle Eric Winston explained earlier this week on PFT Live, the NFL could easily grow the pie by selling the Thursday night package to the highest bidder, in lieu of using it to prop up a league-owned network with far less distribution than it deserves.  The other easy answer would be to eliminate the playoff byes, adding four games to the wild-card round that could be sold to the networks.

Bears Will Pay Coaches Until Games are Missed
According to the Sun-Times, the Bears organization is handling themselves with immense class in the current situation:
While the overwhelming majority of NFL coaches will be forced to accept pay cuts in the event of a labor stoppage, Bears assistants have been assured their pay won’t be docked unless a lockout forces NFL games to be canceled, team president Ted Phillips said Friday.

Good for the Bears.  

0 Comments

Audibles From the Long Snapper

| March 2nd, 2011

It’s the slowest time of the NFL season, unless you get excited about franchise tags and press releases from the mediators of collective bargaining sessions.  In Bearsland, it’s no different.  

My Thoughts on the Release of Tommie Harris
I saw the announcement and I did not care and that, that more than anything, tells the story of Tommie Harris’ career with the Chicago Bears.  For one short time he was the most dominant player at his position but a series of on-field injuries and in-brain disasters caused the train to not only veer off the track but through the station and into the church across the street.  Tommie Harris has no one to blame for his career decline but himself.  Some guys don’t have it together.  Tommie is one of those guys.  And now a man who should have wound up in Canton, having found the perfect system to play in, will finish his disappointing career jumping in-and-out of line rotations, playing a season with the Raiders and disappearing.
Pompei on Ruskell
Without specifics, Dan Pompei writes about the approach of new personnel director Tim Ruskell to this coming off-season – a fascinating one for the Chicago Bears.  As Pompei asks to start the article, “What do you do with a roster that was good enough to get to within one game of the Super Bowl but still has significant holes and is not as young as you would like?”  Pompei then writes:
Some might argue the top half of the Bears’ board should be heavy with defensive players, given the age of some of the key defenders. But Ruskell doesn’t see it that way.

 Can someone explain to me the essence of this “argument”?  Are the Bears simply content to plod along offensively while focusing all their attention on defensive depth.  They have, right now, in place, a defense that can hold the world champions to three scores or less.  They need to score points.  They need to block.

Roster Decisions Coming This Week
Of the Bears unrestricted free agents (Kreutz, Anthony Adams, Roach, Maynard, Rashied, Corey Graham, Tinoisamoa, Danieal Manning) the only one I would not make a priority is Maynard.  Sure I have no reason to believe Richmond McGee is capable of taking over the full-time punting duties in Chicago but Maynard’s inconsistency is simply no longer tolerable.  

0 Comments

Lovie’s Extension Does Not Cool Hot Seat

| February 28th, 2011

Some fans have written their protest songs about the contract extension given to Lovie Smith by Jerry Angelo and the Chicago Bears.  Some believe we have entered into a deal with the world’s most boring devil – a devil that has no concept of game management or the correct use of challenge flags.  Some believe the surprising 2010 campaign, capped off with a trip to the NFC title game, had nothing to do with the head coach from Big Sandy, Texas. 

Here’s the truth.  Most sports fans are impetuous, thoughtless morons.  Just listen to a local call-in radio show for three or four hours and you’ll find yourself asking questions like, “Did that guy really wait on hold for an hour to say the Jets should try onside kicking more?”  Fans, for the most part, don’t have any idea what’s actually taking place on the playing field.  That requires some reading, some careful viewing, speaking to and listening to people who know much more than you.  And most folks don’t have the time.
Another truth.  Most well-run NFL franchises don’t allow coaches to exist on a one-year deal.  Because the sport is so system-oriented, it becomes difficult for coaches to get players to buy into a system if they don’t believe the system will be there long-term.  Why learn three-technique for a defense that won’t be in place in twelve months?  Lovie would have been on a his final year in 2011.  The Bears would not allow that.  So they gave him an extension.  A one-year extension would have been transparently cosmetic.  They gave him two.
If Lovie Smith fails next season, especially if the Bears spend more money this offseason, he’ll be fired.  I don’t doubt that for a moment.  This contract is not so much a reward for good work as another opportunity for Smith to find consistency.  His career in Chicago has been successful, without question, but it has not been consistent.  The Bears believe the program has turned the corner and now Lovie must prove that it has.  But make no mistake about it: Lovie Smith is coaching for his life again in 2011.