0 Comments

Lay Off the Damn Kickers

| September 28th, 2009

Being an asshole in post-game press conferences is to the NFL what alcoholism and baldness are to the rest of us: genetically inherited traits.  Jim Mora publicly admonished kicker Olindo Mare in the wake of the Seahawk loss, essentially pinning the entire loss on his kicker.  Today he rescinded that criticism (in a too-little-too-late gesture) and Tom Jackson piled on by raving about the lack of work kickers put in during the week. 

You know what?  Shut up.  Everybody. 

If organizations don’t need kickers to kick, let one of the other neanderthals do the work.  Until that happens, they’re part of your team and part of the game.  And often they’ll have a more direct impact on the outcomes of games than players on the bottom half of a roster.  I’d much rather have a great Robbie Gould than a great nickel corner, wouldn’t you?  Ask the Patriots how many Super Bowls they won because of their kicker.  Ask the Giants how much Larry Tynes meant to their championship run.  Kickers shouldn’t run their mouth or act like morons on the field, I understand that.  But I don’t need a head coach who has only won three more games than he’s lost running his mouth either.

And really, Jim Mora?  You don’t criticize the two defenders who missed tackling Devin Hester on the game-winning touchdown?  You don’t blame a ridiculously moronic throw by Seneca Wallace into the arms of Lance Briggs on the game’s most important play?  No.  Of course you don’t.  Because kickers are the easy target.  Kicking field goals is the only identifiably solitary action in the sport.  It’s one man, a ball and a giant yellow thing.  Mora thinks he’s being a tough coach but he’s really being a counter-productive bully. Comments like his actually add pressure to the act by further isolating the individual from his teammates. 

If you don’t want to deal with field goal kickers, score touchdowns.  Simple as that.  Score touchdowns and you’ll never need the kicker to kick.  Or is that deficiency the kicker’s fault too? 

0 Comments

Take the Win, Leave Town

| September 28th, 2009

Sometimes you have to put the notch in the win column, board the plane and go back to Chicago.  That’s what the Bears should do after yesterday’s painful victory over the Seattle Seahawks.  Some thoughts…

  • Ron Turner needs to understand, and understand now, that Jay Cutler is the offense’s best weapon and stop taking the ball out of his hands in big situations.  (Side note: I’m already taking the guy for granted and it’s only been three ballgames.)
  • Why are we asking Robbie Gould to kick fifty-three yarders on an opening drive?  Decisions like that remind me why I don’t care for Lovie Smith.
  • If we don’t get to the quarterback on a drop back, it’s a guaranteed first down.  The replay of Zack Bowman backtracking fifteen yards off Nate “Jerry Rice” Burleson tells that entire story. 
  • That was a lot of talking for 4 catches – 35 yards, Mr. Houshmandzadeh.
  • Is there a more live-by-the-sword-die-by-the-sword player than Peanut Tillman?  He could have prevented a touchdown by simply shoving Julius Jones out of bounds on the Hawk opening drive but went for the strip instead.  Then he strips TJ later in the game in a moment of brilliance.
  • They should show every play of Lance Briggs’ performance to kids who want to play linebacker.  I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again – Urlacher is the better athlete but Briggs is the better linebacker.
  • Rod Marinelli has improved the hell out of the pass rush but no player is more improved on the defensive line than Anthony Adams.  Adams struggled to make the active roster throughout 2008 but now has become the anchor of the defensive line.
  • I owe Devin Hester a rather huge apology.  I have been very critical of not only his football acumen but his human intelligence and that’s simply not fair.  When we look at the stat sheet come the end of the season, Hester is going to look an awful lot like one of those number one receivers you see on the television set.
  • Sometimes Chris Williams looks like he’ll be the Bears starting left tackle for a decade and sometimes he looks like a rookie.  I guess dems da breaks.
  • I know Chicago is in love with Johnny Knox but why isn’t Danieal Manning returning kickoffs?  Manning, when healthy, is capable of changing games back there.
  • New rule for the opposition: you can not kick field goals against the Chicago Bears.

0 Comments

Sunday A Must-Win

| September 25th, 2009

If the 2009 Chicago Bears have their eyes on the third division title of the Lovie Smith era, they must beat the Seattle Seahawks on Sunday.  No question about it.  You can’t fancy yourselves a contender and lose a road game you’re favored to win against a team sans their starting quarterback and best defensive player.  It’s not allowed.

It’s about more than Hawk health, however.  The Bears have a lot to prove.  The 2008 Bears only won three consecutive games once all season – in December.  A win Sunday would give them the opportunity to achieve that goal next week, at home, against the Lions.  Outside of December, they never won back-to-back games that did not involve the Detroit.  A successful NFL season is about consistency and improvement.  The ’09 Bears should improve steadily.  But will they be consistent?

As Zach Zaidman points out, they’re also 3-9 away from home over their last twelve.  Aside from humiliating losses at Atlanta, Green Bay and Minnesota last season, the Bears also refused to show up defensively with their playoff aspirations on the line in Houston.  They’re only impressive road victory all season came in Indianapolis on opening night.  They tend to suffer meltdowns late and commit a load of pre-snap penalties.  Depleted or not, they can’t afford to face long yardage on offense or give a terrific receiving corps extra opportunities to make plays.

Must-wins come in different shades.  The Tennessee Titans must beat the New York Jets to rescue a drowning season.  The Green Bay Packers must beat the St. Louis Rams because they’re the St. Louis Rams and the Pack is under tremendous scrutiny.  The Carolina Panthers must beat the Dallas Cowboys or last season’s conference #2 seed will be competing for the #2 pick in the draft.  The Bears don’t face such dire straits.  They could salvage starting 1-2 but salvage what? 

Probably 8-8.

0 Comments

Friday Rodeo and…THE PICKS!

| September 25th, 2009

If the Bears actually believe that the work Tommie Harris is doing will pay off down the stretch, I guess I’ll remain optimistic.  Rod Marinelli has done some magical things so far but Tommie regaining his All Pro form would elevate this defense from good to great.  It has been some time…

I’ve been trying to understand why TJ Houshmandzadeh would run his mouth prior to playing the Bears and I’ve come up with an answer: he’s an idiot.  “I feel I’m going to win 95 percent of the time and they can get the other 5.”  I mean, you’re TJ Houshmandzadeh.  Relax.  Good to see the captain responding.

The Johnny Knox lovefest continues at Sports Illustrated, where Don Banks wrote that “his game-tying 7-yard touchdown reception in the fourth quarter of the
Bears’ 17-14 upset of the Steelers on Sunday was a revelation.”  I’ve watched that play many times and, while it was excellent, I think we all need to relax and let the kid play ball.

I have never seen less football information from a local newspaper than what is available from the Seattle Times.  There’s a story about Walter Jones’ past and literally nothing else.  I wouldn’t expect Matty H to play Sunday.
 
Turned my luck around with a 2-1 last week, bringing my season to 3-3.  Now we begin the ascension…

Chicago -2 at SEATTLE
I rarely bet the Bears but I realistically think they’re going to win this game by ten-to-twenty points.  Or twenty-four.  Bears 34, Seahawks 7

Carolina +8.5 at DALLAS
What team is Dallas really eight and a half points better than?  Carolina is desperate at 0-2 and the Cowboys are coming off a demoralizing, primetime defeat on the opening night of their new stadium.  I wouldn’t be surprised if Dallas lost.  Panthers 20, Cowboys 17

Tennessee +2.5 at NEW YORK JETS
The Titans’ season is on the line in the Meadowlands and they’re just too good to fall to 0-3.  I think they stall the Jets’ running game and force Mark Sanchez into a big spot pick-six.  Titans 16, Jets 13

0 Comments

Chicago at Seattle

| September 23rd, 2009

Auditioning actors for the duration tomorrow so I’ll give y’all a full day to ponder my prediction for this weekend’s pivotal ballgame in Seattle.  Why pivotal?  Because with Detroit around the corner, the Bears have a prime opportunity to get to the bye week at 3-1: their best start since 2006.

Your 2009 Chicago Bears
at
Seattle Seahawks 

Why do I like the Chicago Bears this week?

  • I always like the Chicago Bears.
  • Seneca Wallace came in and threw a touchdown pass on his first play last week.  A one yard bomb.  The Seahawk possessions after that: punt, punt, interception, punt, turnover on downs, end of game.  
  • The ‘Hawks have only allowed one sack this season and we’ve seen what happens when quarterbacks are given too much time in the pocket against our secondary.  It’s incumbent upon Peanut and Bowman to take away short and intermediate routes from T.J. and Nate, especially the suddenly loose-mouthed Houshmandzadeh. When the ball is completed the safeties have to make the receivers pay for it.  Play violently.  I think they do. 
  • Sunday is very much about the Bears’ offensive line, who’ve dramatically underperformed to this point.  The 49ers shredded this Lofa-less defense to the tune of 256 yards.  If the fellas up front can’t spring Forte on Sunday, the coaching staff has to consider making changes at either the left guard and left tackle positions.  And no pre-snap penalties.  I don’t care how noisy it gets.  None.
  • I can’t remember a Bears wideout receiving the kind of media attention being showered on Johnny Knox and I’ll be interested to see how Jim Mora approaches him defensively.  If the Hawks forget about Devin Hester on the other side of the field, look out for big numbers from Jay Cutler and #23.  Real big.
  • My best friend Lou wants me to predict the game based on the first game ever played between the Bears and the Seahawks.  I thought it was a dumb idea and then I looked at the stats from that game in1976.  The Bears had 259 on the ground and 250 in the air.  They won.  I like it.  The score?

Chicago Bears 34, Seattle Seahawks 7

0 Comments

Around the NFC North

| September 22nd, 2009

Minnesota Vikings (2-0)
From the Beats:
Fans and media in Minnesota are starting to clamor for Narcissus to throw the ball downfield but Brad Childress is not budging on the team’s current game plan of run, run, run, screen, run, screen, run.

The world’s best rush defense has struggled through the first two weeks, falling from first over the past three seasons to fifteenth.  They were gashed for big gains by Kevin Smith throughout the first half Sunday.

The Vikings introduced the please-make-it-go-away-Wildcat on Sunday, pulling Brett Favre off the field entirely and lining up Percy Harvin in shotgun.

My take:
  
I’ve seen every snap of the Vikings early season and a few things are clear.  (1) Brett Favre is taking far more hits than he ever expected and the Vikings are limiting his downfield attempts because they’re afraid of losing him by Week Six.  (2) Adrian Peterson has this team on his back – making huge plays when there isn’t even a hole in front of him.  (3) The Vikings have their victories against inarguably the two worst teams in the sport.  
Green Bay Packers (1-1)
From the Beats:
The Pack have sounded the alarm regarding their offensive line and some are hypothesizing that it may cost folks their jobs in Cheeseville.  This is a particularly condemning passage:

Five years into Thompson’s reign, four years into McCarthy’s and three
years into Campen’s, something isn’t right. The Packers are lucky to be
1-1 and have a healthy starting quarterback considering the number of
sacks (10) and additional quarterback knockdowns (nine) they have given
up in the first two games of the season.

I wonder what they’d be saying if the Bears had won on opening night.

The Packers not only lost to Cincinnati but they lost a couple players to potentially serious injuries.

Mike Vandermause does not a nice job calling out the early-season hysteria in Green Bay but the column could probably have been written in every city that’s lost a game this year.  Football fans have too many days off between games and too many places to express their opinions.  I know.  I’m partly to blame.

My take:
The Pack should take a deep breath and look at their schedule.  The next six pack features four entirely winnable games (at St. Louis, Cleveland and Tampa Bay, home Detroit) and two against the Minnesota Vikings.  They should be 5-3 at worst and poised to make a run down the stretch.

Detroit Lions (0-2)
From Michael Rosenberg in the Free Press:

The Lions host the Washington Redskins this week, and this is a little different from most of the Lions’ games
because — you’ll never believe this — they can actually win.

0 Comments

A Tuesday Night Rodeo

| September 22nd, 2009

Receiver as Flavor of the Month
Please, please, please Chicago media.  Please don’t ruin Johnny Knox’s chance at having a terrific career at wide receiver for the Bears.  Don’t be fooled by the love affair that has developed at both the major dailies because as quickly as they’ll praise the NFL’s 15th ranked receiver, they’ll be even faster to whack him in the barber’s chair if his production fades.

I Think We Need a New Bus
The Chicago Bears are still claiming to be a running football team even as they’ve obviously transformed into a throwing football team. 

“Of course we would like to run the football,” Smith said. “But if
(they) come with that pressure (vs. the run), and we single up on the
outside (receivers), you have to throw the ball, and the guys on the
outside have to win the 1-on-1 battles, and we won it constantly
throughout the day.”

A great quarterback and receivers winning one-on-one battles?  What team is this?